Sample policy · Independent specialist doctor

Scope of practice, indemnity and continuity policy (independent specialist doctor)

Statutory anchor: Regulation 12 (safe care and treatment), Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 (SI 2014/2936). This policy also engages Regulation 17 (good governance). The primary professional source for this policy is GMC Good medical practice and the statutory requirement for doctors to hold adequate and appropriate indemnity or insurance; the verbatim quotes below are taken from the engaged CQC Regulation, because the GMC standards and the indemnity requirement are not held in the Verivius regulation manifest. · primary source

1. What the regulation says

Care and treatment must be provided in a safe way for service users. (Reg 12(1) (the headline duty))

ensuring that persons providing care or treatment to service users have the qualifications, competence, skills and experience to do so safely, (Reg 12(2)(c) (staff competence))

where responsibility for the care and treatment of service users is shared with, or transferred to, other persons, working with such other persons, service users and other appropriate persons to ensure that timely care planning takes place to ensure the health, safety and welfare of the service users. (Reg 12(2)(i) (shared / transferred responsibility))

Regulation 17 adds the governance and records duties that this policy operationalises:

Systems or processes must be established and operated effectively to ensure compliance with the requirements in this Part. (Reg 17(1): the umbrella duty)

The full text is at https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/2936/regulation/12 and https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/2936/regulation/17. Where this policy and the regulation diverge, the regulation wins.

2. Plain-English summary

Care and treatment must be provided in a safe way. The regulation lists the areas a provider must address, including risk assessment, risk mitigation, staff competence, safe premises, safe equipment, sufficient equipment and medicines, medicines safety, infection prevention and shared-care planning. Regulation 12 is central to CQC's safety expectations. Alongside this, you have to run effective systems and processes to comply with everything else in Part 3, including the quality, risk and records duties in Regulation 17, and a single-handed doctor must hold adequate and appropriate indemnity and work within the competence set out in GMC Good medical practice.

3. Purpose

A single-handed independent specialist works without colleagues on hand, without an easy second opinion, and is the only person delivering the service. Three risks follow: drifting outside their competence with no one to check them, working without adequate indemnity, and leaving patients without care when they are away, unwell or stop practising. This policy sets out how the practice manages its scope, holds proper indemnity, and keeps care continuous.

The practice must verify this policy against current GMC guidance and the legal requirement to hold indemnity before adoption.

4. Scope

This policy applies to:

5. Roles and responsibilities

6. Scope, indemnity and continuity procedure

The practice follows this procedure to keep the service safe:

  1. Define the current scope. Keep a written list of the consultations, procedures, investigations, prescribing activity and follow-up arrangements the practice offers.
  2. Check competence. For each activity, record the doctor's training, experience, continuing professional development, appraisal or peer-review evidence that supports safe practice.
  3. Check CQC and business fit. Confirm the activity fits the provider's regulated activities, statement of purpose, premises, equipment, staffing, emergency arrangements and patient information.
  4. Check indemnity before work starts. Confirm with the indemnity provider or insurer that cover includes the activity, setting, patient group, remote element, procedure type and any higher-risk feature.
  5. Assess the risk of the activity. Identify what could go wrong, what equipment or support is needed, when a second opinion is required, and when the patient should be referred elsewhere.
  6. Approve or decline the work. Do not offer a service until competence, indemnity, registration fit and continuity arrangements are confirmed.
  7. Plan continuity. Name who checks results, urgent messages, referrals, patient queries and active follow-up when the doctor is away or unwell.
  8. Tell patients the route for help. Patient information explains what the practice can and cannot provide, how to get urgent help, and what happens during absence.
  9. Review after change. Recheck scope and indemnity after any new procedure, new premises, new equipment, remote-service change, complaint, incident, serious adverse outcome or CQC registration change.
  10. Escalate safety or probity concerns. If the doctor may be working outside competence, without suitable indemnity, while unfit to practise, or outside registration, pause the activity and seek advice from the indemnity provider, responsible officer, GMC, CQC or legal adviser as appropriate.

7. Working within scope and competence

8. Arrangements for advice and referral

9. Indemnity and insurance

10. Continuity when the doctor is unavailable

Because one person delivers the service, the practice plans for that person being away or unwell:

11. Fitness to practise

The doctor does not practise when their own health or any other factor means they cannot do so safely, and has arrangements (including their own GP and occupational support) and a plan for what happens to patients if they become unable to practise at short notice.

12. Closing the practice

If the practice closes or the doctor stops practising, there is a plan for: telling patients, transferring or continuing the care of patients under active treatment, and keeping and making available the clinical records for the required retention period (see the clinical records and information governance policy).

13. Recording

The practice records its defined scope, its current indemnity, its advice and referral routes, and its continuity and closure arrangements, and keeps them up to date.

14. Records and register links

The scope, indemnity and continuity evidence trail should include:

Scope drift, indemnity gaps, unplanned absence failures and closure risks are tracked through the risk register and improvement-actions register. Serious patient-safety events are opened on the incident register and reviewed at the governance meeting.

15. Training and competence

The doctor keeps competence current through continuing professional development, appraisal, peer review, audit and feedback from incidents, complaints and outcomes. Any staff who book patients or answer queries receive training on the practice's current scope, exclusions, urgent escalation routes, absence plan and how to raise a concern if a request falls outside the approved service.

Training and competence evidence is held in the training matrix or governance file. Scope changes are not launched until the competence and indemnity evidence has been reviewed.

16. Audit cadence

The practice checks, on a stated cadence, that:

The doctor and the Registered Manager review the results and record the improvement actions that follow.

17. Sources and further reading

This template is based on CQC's guidance for providers and managers, the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, and other topic-specific legislation and guidance listed below. It is a starting point for adaptation, not a substitute for legal, clinical, HR, safeguarding or specialist professional advice.

18. Related reading

19. When to seek further advice

Seek specialist advice where the issue involves serious harm, safeguarding, deprivation of liberty, restraint, children, professional misconduct, controlled drugs, radiation, termination of pregnancy, infection outbreak, water safety, employment dismissal, DBS barring referral, or regulatory enforcement.

20. Document control

Version Date Author Changes
v1.1 2026-07-12 Verivius (sample) Added role ownership, scope and continuity procedure, evidence fields, register links, training and competence controls, and related reading.
v1 2026-06-10 Verivius (sample) Conformed to the Verivius policy standard: added statutory anchor, verbatim regulation quotes, plain-English summary, and standard sources, advice and document-control blocks. Existing operational sections preserved and renumbered.

This sample policy template was issued by Verivius. It is a template, not a substitute for legal advice or the tenant's own policy-development process. Where this template and live law or regulator guidance diverge, the live source wins.

What good looks like here

Written from an ex-CQC inspector's chair, but the point is safe, well-led care your team can stand behind. Each row shows what strong evidence looks like, what thin evidence looks like, and where the expectation comes from.

A single-handed independent specialist is the whole service. There is no colleague in the next room to question a borderline decision, no rota to absorb an unplanned illness, and no partner to pick up an abnormal result that lands while the doctor is away. That is why the three risks in this policy sit together rather than apart. Scope drifts because nobody is watching it drift, indemnity quietly stops matching the work because the work changed and the certificate did not, and a patient part-way through an investigation can be left holding a result with no route back into care. For the patient, the harm is rarely dramatic on the day: it is the follow-up that never happened, the referral nobody chased, or the discovery after something goes wrong that the cover did not reach the procedure they consented to. Writing the scope down, confirming cover against it before the first patient is booked, and naming who handles active patients during absence is what turns solo practice from something held in one person's head into something that survives that person being unavailable.

  1. Indemnity is checked against the actual scope of work before a new or higher-risk activity starts, not just a certificate on file. The gap that matters is a procedure, remote element or patient group the cover does not actually reach, which the patient only finds out about when they need to claim.

    Strong evidence: The indemnity or insurance certificate plus the written confirmation of cover for each higher-risk or new activity (indemnity-and-insurance section and evidence trail).

    Weak evidence: A single indemnity certificate in the folder, renewed each year and checked no further than the expiry date, with nothing in writing from the indemnity provider about the new procedure, the remote consultation, the paediatric patient or the higher-risk case. The tell is a service sitting on the price list or the booking system that nobody has ever put to the insurer, so the first real test of whether cover reaches it would be a claim.

    A legal duty. This comes from legislation that applies to your service, so meeting it is not optional. The exact provision is cited beneath the badge.

    Medical Act 1983 s.44C (inserted by the Health Care and Associated Professions (Indemnity Arrangements) Order 2014, SI 2014/1887)

  2. Each activity in the declared scope has competence evidence behind it, not a blanket claim. With no colleague on site to act as a check, the training, continuing professional development, appraisal or peer-review trail is attached to each activity, so the person booked for a procedure is treated by someone whose competence in that specific procedure is evidenced.

    Strong evidence: The declared service scope with its exclusions, and the competence, continuing professional development, appraisal or peer-review record (scope-and-competence procedure and evidence trail).

    Weak evidence: One appraisal line saying the doctor works within their competence, or a curriculum vitae standing in as evidence for every activity the service offers. The gap shows when a procedure or patient group on the declared scope has no course record, logbook, audit or peer input behind it, and when nothing in the record shows a complex or uncertain case being taken to anyone for a second opinion, because there is no colleague on site to ask.

    The recognised standard from a professional or clinical body, such as NICE or a royal college. Not a legal duty, but the accepted mark of safe practice, and a departure needs a documented reason.
  3. Continuity arrangements actually handle results, urgent messages and active follow-up during planned and unplanned absence, not merely name who to phone. The person mid-pathway waiting on a result does not wait longer because the doctor is away.

    Strong evidence: The continuity plan for planned and unplanned absence and the active-patient follow-up list used during absence or closure (continuity section and evidence trail).

    Weak evidence: A continuity section that names a colleague and a mobile number, with nothing showing that blood results, imaging reports, urgent messages and pending referrals were actually picked up and acted on during the last absence. The weak version has no list of the patients under active treatment at the point the doctor went away, so nobody could say who was mid-pathway or who was waiting on a result.

    The recognised standard from a professional or clinical body, such as NICE or a royal college. Not a legal duty, but the accepted mark of safe practice, and a departure needs a documented reason.
  4. The service actually being offered still matches the CQC registration and statement of purpose, not a service that has drifted beyond either. A procedure, site or remote element the registration does not reach means patients are being seen outside what the practice is registered for.

    Strong evidence: The CQC registration and statement-of-purpose check recorded for each activity (scope procedure and evidence trail).

    Weak evidence: A statement of purpose written at registration and untouched since, while the website, price list or booking system now offers a procedure, a site or a remote service the registration does not reach. Nothing records a check that the new activity falls inside the registered regulated activities before the first patient was booked.

    A legal duty. This comes from legislation that applies to your service, so meeting it is not optional. The exact provision is cited beneath the badge.

    Health and Social Care Act 2008 s.10(1) (and s.33 for registration conditions); Care Quality Commission (Registration) Regulations 2009, reg 4 (statement of purpose)

  5. There is a closure plan that names how patients under active treatment are transferred and how records are kept and made available for the retention period, not a gap left for when the single-handed practice stops. The person mid-treatment when the doors close still has someone picking their care up, and still gets an answer to a records request.

    Strong evidence: The closure plan, records-transfer plan and patient communication template (closing-the-practice section and evidence trail).

    Weak evidence: No closure plan at all, because closure feels distant, or a plan that stops at telling patients the practice has shut. Weak versions do not say who takes over patients mid-treatment, where the clinical records will physically sit, who answers a records request once the doors close, or what happens if the doctor stops at short notice through illness rather than by choice.

    Our recommended baseline. Not a legal or regulatory requirement, but a sensible standard we suggest where the rules leave the detail to you. Adapt it to your service.

Last verified 20 July 2026

Spotted something to improve?

These are sample templates, not the last word. If you would change a wording, or want to help us confirm a detail, tell us and we will look at it.

Related Verivius content

Want help adapting this to your service?

A Verivius consultant can read your adapted policy against the live regulation and your service shape. The work fits inside a Mock Inspection engagement or a shorter consulting brief. A 20-minute conversation is the fastest way to find out whether the fit is right.

Get started free

Free to start, no card. A 14-day trial when you subscribe.

Last reviewed 10 June 2026