1. Who this diagnostic imaging reporting policy is for
This sample policy is for diagnostic imaging providers that need a reporting standards and turnaround policy. It is written for independent ultrasound, MRI, CT, X-ray, mammography, fluoroscopy and mixed-modality services that acquire images and issue, arrange or rely on clinical reports.
Use this page when the evidence question is: can we show that reports are issued by competent reporters, within defined turnaround standards, with urgent findings escalated, report issue recorded, discrepancies reviewed and delays turned into learning? It focuses on reporter scope, report content, turnaround targets, urgent findings, peer review, discrepancy learning and the audit trail from acquisition to report receipt.
For clinically important unexpected findings, use the incidental findings disclosure and follow-up policy. For radiation-bearing examinations, use the IR(ME)R local rules and radiation safety policy. For MRI access and screening risk, use the MRI safety and screening policy. For contrast reactions, use the contrast media safety policy. For the wider sector cluster, see the diagnostic imaging guide.
2. What the regulation says
Care and treatment must be provided in a safe way for service users. (Reg 12(1) (the headline duty))
assessing the risks to the health and safety of service users of receiving the care or treatment, (Reg 12(2)(a) (risk assessment))
doing all that is reasonably practicable to mitigate any such risks, (Reg 12(2)(b) (risk mitigation))
ensuring that persons providing care or treatment to service users have the qualifications, competence, skills and experience to do so safely, (Reg 12(2)(c) (staff competence))
where responsibility for the care and treatment of service users is shared with, or transferred to, other persons, working with such other persons, service users and other appropriate persons to ensure that timely care planning takes place to ensure the health, safety and welfare of the service users. (Reg 12(2)(i) (shared / transferred responsibility))
Regulation 17 adds the good-governance duties that this policy operationalises:
Systems or processes must be established and operated effectively to ensure compliance with the requirements in this Part. (Reg 17(1): the umbrella duty)
assess, monitor and improve the quality and safety of the services provided in the carrying on of the regulated activity (including the quality of the experience of service users in receiving those services) ... assess, monitor and mitigate the risks relating to the health, safety and welfare of service users and others who may be at risk which arise from the carrying on of the regulated activity. (Reg 17(2)(a) and (b): quality and risk)
The full text is at https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/2936/regulation/12 and https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/2936/regulation/17. Where this policy and the regulation diverge, the regulation wins.
3. Plain-English summary
Care and treatment must be provided in a safe way. The regulation lists the areas a provider must address, including risk assessment, risk mitigation, staff competence, safe premises, safe equipment, sufficient equipment and medicines, medicines safety, infection prevention and shared-care planning. Regulation 12 is central to CQC's safety expectations. Reporting standards, reporter scope, urgent-finding communication and turnaround monitoring are how an imaging service shows that the report part of the pathway is competent, timely and safe, and that risks created by delay, discrepancy or out-of-scope reporting are assessed and mitigated.
4. Purpose
This policy sets out how the Service maintains reporting standards, reporter scope, turnaround monitoring, urgent finding communication, peer review and discrepancy learning.
It covers the audit trail from image acquisition to report issue and referrer receipt.
5. Modality applicability
Modality applicability: this policy applies to ultrasound, MRI, CT, X-ray, mammography, fluoroscopy and other imaging examinations where the Service acquires images and issues, arranges or receives a clinical report.
6. Scope
This policy applies to:
- image acquisition and report creation
- reporter qualification and scope
- radiologist reporting
- sonographer and reporting radiographer scope where used
- urgent and unexpected findings
- turnaround targets
- report issue and receipt
- outsourcing or insourcing reporting
- peer review and discrepancy meetings
- delayed reporting and report quality incidents
The policy applies to direct reporting by the Service and outsourced reporting arranged under the Service's governance.
7. Reporting workflow
The Service keeps a complete audit trail from scan acquisition to report receipt by the referrer or responsible clinician.
7.1 Acquisition and report request
Staff record the examination before images are released for reporting.
The record includes:
- patient identity
- examination type
- modality
- indication or clinical question
- referrer or responsible clinician
- date and time of acquisition
- operator
- reporter assigned
- urgency category
- images transferred for reporting
- technical limitations or incomplete examination
Staff escalate immediately if an image cannot be transferred, stored or retrieved.
7.2 Reporter qualification and scope
The Service keeps a reporter scope matrix.
The matrix records:
- reporter name and role
- professional registration
- modality scope
- body-system or examination scope
- independent reporting status
- supervision or second-read requirement
- date of competency sign-off
- peer review participation
- restrictions and exclusions
Sonographers and reporting radiographers report only within documented scope. The Radiologist reviews scope exceptions and records the decision.
7.3 Report content standard
The report answers the clinical question where possible and records limitations.
The report includes:
- patient identity
- examination performed
- date of examination
- clinical indication
- relevant findings
- conclusion or impression
- urgent or unexpected finding flag where applicable
- recommended follow-up where within scope
- reporter name and role
- date and time of verification
The Service checks the detailed report standard against current RCR, SCoR and modality guidance before adoption.
7.4 Report issue and receipt
The Service records that the verified report has been issued to the referrer or responsible clinician.
The record includes:
- report verification date and time
- transmission route
- recipient
- failed transmission or bounce-back
- manual resend where needed
- urgent communication route where applicable
- confirmation of receipt where local policy requires it
Reports are not treated as complete until issue has been recorded.
8. Turnaround standards and escalation
The Service sets reporting turnaround targets by modality, urgency and contract type.
Targets must be verified against current NHS England, RCR, commissioner and local source material before adoption. Where no external target applies, the Service labels the target as a local Verivius default.
The turnaround record includes:
- acquisition time
- report assigned time
- report verified time
- report issued time
- referrer receipt confirmation where required
- reason for delay
- escalation action
Delayed reporting is recorded as an incident where delay creates patient risk, complaint risk or repeated governance concern.
9. Urgent findings, peer review and discrepancy learning
9.1 Urgent findings
The Service has a written urgent-findings communication pathway.
The pathway records:
- finding category
- responsible reporter
- clinician contacted
- contact route
- date and time
- advice or action requested
- failed contact attempts
- follow-up confirmation
The reporter does not rely on a report alone where the local urgent-findings standard requires direct alerting.
9.2 Peer review
The Service runs peer review according to local modality and professional requirements.
Peer review covers:
- sample selection
- modality mix
- reporter mix
- discrepancy category
- learning point
- individual support where needed
- system improvement where needed
Peer review is recorded as learning, not blame, unless conduct or competence concerns require separate action.
9.3 Discrepancy and report quality issue
The Service records a discrepancy or report quality issue when a report is materially wrong, unclear, delayed or outside reporter scope.
The review checks:
- clinical impact
- whether an amended report is needed
- whether the referrer and patient need communication
- whether duty of candour applies
- whether reporter scope or supervision needs review
- whether the issue indicates a wider pathway problem
10. Responsibilities
- Registered Manager: owns this policy, ensures reporting governance is reviewed and signs off annual review.
- Radiologist: owns reporting standards, urgent finding escalation, peer review and discrepancy governance.
- Lead Sonographer: assures ultrasound reporting scope and escalates findings outside scope.
- Reporting radiographer or sonographer: reports only within documented scope and records urgent communication where required.
- Radiographer or operator: records acquisition details, image-quality limitations and image transfer exceptions.
- Administration staff: monitor report issue, failed transmission and turnaround exceptions where delegated.
- All staff: escalate reporting delays or urgent communication failures promptly.
11. Recording requirements
The Service keeps the following records:
- examination record
- report request
- reporter scope matrix
- report
- urgent finding communication record
- report issue record
- turnaround monitoring record
- failed transmission record
- peer review record
- discrepancy record
- delayed reporting incident
- duty of candour decision
- improvement action record
Records are kept in the Service governance records and linked to the patient record where relevant.
12. Audit cadence
The Service uses the following Verivius default audit rhythm unless current RCR, SCoR, NHS England, CQC, commissioner or local source material requires a different rhythm:
- Per examination: Staff record acquisition, report verification and report issue details.
- Weekly: the reporting lead reviews overdue reports and failed transmission records.
- Monthly: the Radiologist reviews turnaround performance, urgent findings and report quality incidents.
- Quarterly: the Service reviews peer review outputs, discrepancies and reporter scope exceptions.
- Annually: the Registered Manager audits this policy against current source material and updates targets.
Audit findings are recorded as improvement actions with an owner and review date.
13. Version control and review date
The Service keeps a controlled copy of this policy. The footer or document-control table records:
- policy owner
- version number
- date approved
- next review date
- changes made since the last version
- source material checked during the review
14. Related records
- Reporter scope matrix
- Examination record
- Imaging report
- Urgent findings communication log
- Turnaround dashboard
- Peer review record
- Discrepancy register
- Incident register
- Duty of candour policy
- Improvement action register
Review cadence: annual or on regulatory change, whichever sooner. Owner: Registered Manager.
15. Sources and further reading
This template is based on CQC's guidance for providers and managers, the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, and other topic-specific legislation and guidance listed below. It is a starting point for adaptation, not a substitute for legal, clinical, HR, safeguarding or specialist professional advice.
- CQC Regulation 12: Safe care and treatment
- CQC Regulation 17: Good governance
- RCR Standards for the interpretation and reporting of imaging investigations: https://www.rcr.ac.uk/our-services/all-our-publications/clinical-radiology-publications/standards-for-interpretation-and-reporting-of-imaging-investigations-third-edition/
- RCR recommendations on alerts and notification of imaging reports: https://www.rcr.ac.uk/our-services/all-our-publications/clinical-radiology-publications/recommendations-on-alerts-and-notification-of-imaging-reports/
- NHS England diagnostic imaging reporting turnaround times: https://www.england.nhs.uk/long-read/diagnostic-imaging-reporting-turnaround-times/
- Society of Radiographers professional guidance and publications: https://www.sor.org/
- SoR and BMUS Guidelines for Professional Ultrasound Practice: https://www.bmus.org/media/resources/files/_2023_SoR_and_BMUS_guidelines_8th_Ed_FINAL.pdf
- HCPC standards of proficiency for radiographers: https://www.hcpc-uk.org/standards/standards-of-proficiency/radiographers/
- Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2017 (IR(ME)R 2017), for radiation-bearing examinations
- Local commissioner and contract reporting requirements
- Duty of candour where reporting delay or discrepancy causes harm
- Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 (https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/2936/regulation/12)
16. When to seek further advice
Seek specialist advice where the issue involves serious harm, safeguarding, deprivation of liberty, restraint, children, professional misconduct, controlled drugs, radiation, termination of pregnancy, infection outbreak, water safety, employment dismissal, DBS barring referral, or regulatory enforcement.
17. Document control
| Version | Date | Author | Changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| v1 | 2026-06-10 | Verivius (sample) | Conformed to the Verivius policy standard: added statutory anchor, verbatim Regulation 12 and Regulation 17 quotes, plain-English summary, sources and further reading, when-to-seek-advice and document-control blocks. All original sections retained and renumbered from 3. |
| v1.1 | 2026-07-11 | Verivius (sample) | Added diagnostic-imaging reporting-turnaround intent guidance and links to related imaging policy pages and the sector guide. No regulatory claims changed. |
This sample policy template was issued by Verivius. It is a template, not a substitute for legal advice or the tenant's own policy-development process. Where this template and live law or regulator guidance diverge, the live source wins.