Sample policy · Diagnostic imaging

MRI safety and screening policy (diagnostic imaging)

Statutory anchor: Regulation 12 (safe care and treatment), Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 (SI 2014/2936). The operative primary source for MRI safety practice is the MHRA Safety Guidelines for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Equipment in Clinical Use, read with Society of Radiographers guidance and the scanner manufacturer's safety manual. · primary source

1. What the regulation says

Care and treatment must be provided in a safe way for service users. (Reg 12(1) (the headline duty))

assessing the risks to the health and safety of service users of receiving the care or treatment, (Reg 12(2)(a) (risk assessment))

doing all that is reasonably practicable to mitigate any such risks, (Reg 12(2)(b) (risk mitigation))

ensuring that persons providing care or treatment to service users have the qualifications, competence, skills and experience to do so safely, (Reg 12(2)(c) (staff competence))

ensuring that the premises used by the service provider are safe to use for their intended purpose and are used in a safe way, (Reg 12(2)(d) (premises safety))

ensuring that the equipment used by the service provider for providing care or treatment to a service user is safe for such use and is used in a safe way, (Reg 12(2)(e) (equipment safety))

The full text is at https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/2936/regulation/12. Where this policy and the regulation diverge, the regulation wins.

2. Plain-English summary

Care and treatment must be provided in a safe way. The regulation lists the areas a provider must address, including risk assessment, risk mitigation, staff competence, safe premises, safe equipment, sufficient equipment and medicines, medicines safety, infection prevention and shared-care planning. Regulation 12 is central to CQC's safety expectations.

For MRI specifically, the detailed safety standard sits in the MHRA Safety Guidelines for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Equipment in Clinical Use, in Society of Radiographers guidance, and in the scanner manufacturer's safety manual. This policy operationalises those sources within the Regulation 12 duty.

3. Purpose

This policy sets out how the Service screens patients, staff, visitors and contractors before access to MRI controlled areas, manages MRI Zone 1 to Zone 4 access and responds to MRI safety incidents.

It covers ferromagnetic risk, implant risk, radiofrequency burn risk, quench response and local escalation.

Modality applicability: this policy applies to MRI only. Imaging centres without MRI record this policy as not applicable unless they add MRI equipment or refer patients into an MRI unit under their own governance.

4. Scope

This policy applies to:

The policy applies to fixed MRI, mobile MRI hosted at the Imaging Centre and any subcontracted MRI session controlled by the Service.

4.1 Local arrangements before adoption

Before adoption, the Service records:

The Service must issue local rules, work instructions and emergency procedures after consultation with its MR Safety Expert. The four-zone model may be retained where it is used locally, but it must map clearly to the MHRA terms MR Controlled Access Area and MR Environment.

5. MRI screening and access process

The Service does not allow any person or object into Zone 4 until MRI safety screening is complete and recorded.

5.1 Pre-appointment screening

Booking staff issue or complete a screening form before the appointment where possible.

The screening form covers:

If an answer is uncertain, booking staff escalate to the supervising MR Operator or MR Responsible Person before confirming the appointment.

5.2 On-arrival screening

An appropriately trained MR Authorised Person reviews the screening form with the patient on arrival. Both sign or electronically authenticate the completed review. Staff do not rely solely on the booking form.

The on-arrival check includes:

The MR Operator stops the scan if the patient cannot answer safely and no lawful alternative confirmation route is available.

5.3 Zone access control

The Service defines local controls for each MRI zone.

The Service displays local signage, controls doors and records exceptions. Contractors and visitors do not enter Zone 3 or Zone 4 unless screened and escorted under the local procedure.

5.4 Implant and device verification

Staff verify implants and devices before scanning.

Verification may include:

If compatibility cannot be confirmed, the Service does not scan until a competent role holder has completed and recorded the risk decision.

5.5 Pregnancy and claustrophobia

Staff follow the local pregnancy-screening procedure for patients of childbearing potential.

For claustrophobia or anxiety, Staff consider:

The Service records any decision to stop or abandon the scan.

5.6 In-scan monitoring

The MR Operator keeps contact with the patient during the scan.

Monitoring covers:

Staff stop the scan if the patient reports burning, pain, distress or a safety concern.

6. MRI incident response

The Service records MRI incidents in the incident register and reviews whether external reporting is required.

6.1 Ferromagnetic or projectile incident

If a ferromagnetic item enters Zone 4 or moves towards the magnet, Staff:

The Service considers MHRA Yellow Card reporting where the incident involves equipment, device or safety-system failure.

6.2 Thermal or radiofrequency burn

If a patient reports heating or burning, Staff:

6.3 Quench event

The Service has a written quench response procedure.

The procedure covers:

Staff do not re-enter or restart scanning until the manufacturer, engineer or competent local role confirms it is safe.

7. Training and drill requirements

Staff who work in MRI areas complete MRI safety training before unsupervised access.

Training covers:

The MR Responsible Person keeps the list of MR Authorised Personnel and training evidence current and restricts access where training, certification or screening has expired.

8. Responsibilities

9. Recording requirements and evidence fields

Each patient screening record should include:

The Service also keeps an evidence trail for:

Patient-related safety information forms part of the patient record even where it is held in a separate MRI system. Staff-related screening forms part of the relevant employment record. The Service applies its approved retention schedule and limits access to authorised roles.

10. Audit cadence

The Service uses the following Verivius default audit rhythm unless current MHRA, SCoR, manufacturer, CQC or local source material requires a different rhythm:

Audit findings are recorded as improvement actions with an owner and review date.

11. Version control and review date

The Service keeps a controlled copy of this policy. The footer or document-control table records:

12. Related policies and companion artefacts

Use this policy with the following local artefacts:

Read it with:

Review cadence: annual or on regulatory change, whichever sooner. Owner: Registered Manager.

13. Sources and further reading

This template is based on CQC's guidance for providers and managers, the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, and other topic-specific legislation and guidance listed below. It is a starting point for adaptation, not a substitute for legal, clinical, HR, safeguarding or specialist professional advice.

14. When to seek further advice

Seek specialist advice where the issue involves serious harm, safeguarding, deprivation of liberty, restraint, children, professional misconduct, controlled drugs, radiation, termination of pregnancy, infection outbreak, water safety, employment dismissal, DBS barring referral, or regulatory enforcement.

15. Document control

Version Date Author Changes
v1 2026-06-10 Verivius (sample) Conformed to the Verivius policy standard: added statutory anchor, Regulation 12 verbatim quotes, plain-English summary, standard sources and document-control blocks. Operational sections preserved.
v1.1 2026-07-19 Verivius (sample) Aligned local roles with MHRA terminology and added adoption decisions, detailed screening evidence, companion links and safer emergency-exercise wording.

This sample policy template was issued by Verivius. It is a template, not a substitute for legal advice or the provider's own policy-development process. Where this template and live law or regulator guidance diverge, the live source wins.

What good looks like here

Written from an ex-CQC inspector's chair, but the point is safe, well-led care your team can stand behind. Each row shows what strong evidence looks like, what thin evidence looks like, and where the expectation comes from.

An MRI magnet is on all the time, including overnight, at weekends and through a power failure, so the hazard in the scanner room is permanent and silent: nothing warns a cleaner, an engineer or an anxious relative that the oxygen cylinder in their hand has become a projectile. Almost every serious MRI harm traces back to a screening question asked once at booking and never asked again, or to an implant whose make and model nobody wrote down. The person's experience matters here as much as the physics, because someone lying still and alone inside a narrow, very loud tunnel can only tell you they are burning or panicking if the call bell, the agreed signal and the operator's attention are genuinely in place. A screening record showing who asked, when, what the person said and what was done with any uncertainty is what makes that individual scan safe on the day, and it is also the only thing that lets a service learn from a near miss rather than repeat it. Keeping the MR Responsible Person who runs the unit day to day separate from the MR Safety Expert who advises on the hard cases is what stops an unresolved implant question being settled by whoever is keenest to keep the list running.

  1. No person or object reaches the scanner room until MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) safety screening is complete and recorded, and the form is reviewed with the person on arrival rather than taken on trust from the booking form. Entry to Zone 4 on an unreviewed or single-source screening form is how a pacemaker or a metallic foreign body declared weeks earlier reaches the magnet unconfirmed.

    Strong evidence: The patient screening record (Sections 5.1, 5.2 and 9): outcomes of pre-booking, on-arrival and immediately pre-entry checks, and patient and MR Authorised Person authentication of the reviewed screening form. The policy allows no entry to Zone 4 until screening is complete and recorded, and staff do not rely solely on the booking form.

    Weak evidence: A screening form completed at booking, filed, and never revisited: no on-arrival signature from either the patient or the MR Authorised Person, and no time recorded against the review, so nobody can show whether the check happened before or after the person walked through the door. Weaker still is a single tick against "screening complete" with no record of what the person was actually asked, or an uncertain answer at booking with nothing showing it was escalated to the supervising MR Operator or MR Responsible Person before the appointment was confirmed.

    The recognised standard from a professional or clinical body, such as NICE or a royal college. Not a legal duty, but the accepted mark of safe practice, and a departure needs a documented reason.
  2. Implants and devices are verified before scanning, and no scan proceeds while compatibility is unconfirmed. Scanning through uncertainty is the risk: a scan run without a recorded risk decision by a competent role holder puts the person in the bore on an assumption rather than on a named source and a named decision-maker.

    Strong evidence: The implant and device verification record (Section 5.4): make, model, manufacturer, source checked, MR safety conditions and decision-maker, drawn from manufacturer implant card, medical record, referrer confirmation, device database or MR Safety Expert advice. If compatibility cannot be confirmed the service does not scan until the risk decision is recorded.

    Weak evidence: An entry reading "implant checked, safe" with no make, model or manufacturer written down, or "patient says it is MRI safe" with no implant card, medical record, referrer confirmation or device database named as the source. Weaker again is a record naming the device but not the conditions the manufacturer sets for scanning it, or a completed scan sitting above a verification line that still reads "awaiting confirmation", with no competent role holder named against the risk decision.

    The instructions from the maker of a product, device, or medicine. Following them is how the item is used safely, and for medical devices it is effectively expected.
  3. Ferromagnetic, thermal or radiofrequency burn and quench emergencies have written procedures that are rehearsed and escalated, not procedures nobody has ever walked through. The tell is an incident closed with no MHRA (Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency) Yellow Card assessment, no separate duty of candour assessment, or no annual drill behind the folder. Yellow Card reporting to the MHRA and the duty of candour are separate and independent: candour is owed to the person harmed and is not a notification, and reporting a device failure to the MHRA does not discharge it.

    Strong evidence: The incident register, the written quench response procedure and the annual MRI evacuation and resuscitation drill record (Sections 6 and 10): staff stop the scan and escalate, the service considers MHRA Yellow Card reporting where equipment, device or safety-system failure is involved, separately assesses the duty of candour owed to the person where harm occurred, and exercises the annual drill without initiating a quench.

    Weak evidence: A written quench response procedure in the folder with no date, no signature and no exercise record behind it, so it has never been walked through with the people who would have to open the door, evacuate the patient and manage oxygen depletion. On the incident side, a log entry saying "patient reported hot arm, scan stopped" with no coil, padding or contact-point detail, no note that Yellow Card reporting was considered, and nothing recording whether the harm reached the notifiable safety incident threshold that engages the duty of candour.

    Our recommended baseline. Not a legal or regulatory requirement, but a sensible standard we suggest where the rules leave the detail to you. Adapt it to your service.
  4. Zone controls hold for contractors, visitors and engineers just as they do for patients, and access is withdrawn where training or screening has expired. Unscreened non-clinical entry to Zone 3 or Zone 4 is the failure that reaches the patient: the cleaner or engineer carrying a ferromagnetic object towards the magnet endangers the person on the table, not only themselves.

    Strong evidence: The MR Authorised Personnel register, visitor and contractor screening and escort records, and the MR Controlled Access Area, MR Environment and zone map with access-control exceptions (Sections 4.1, 5.3, 7 and 9). Contractors and visitors do not enter Zone 3 or Zone 4 unless screened and escorted, and the MR Responsible Person restricts access where training, certification or screening has expired.

    Weak evidence: A visitor book holding names and times but no screening question answered, or engineers and cleaners signed in at reception and taken into the scanner room by someone who is not on the MR Authorised Personnel register. Look also for a register whose training, certification or annual screening dates expired months ago while the door codes still work, and for access exceptions that are talked about at handover but never written down.

    The recognised standard from a professional or clinical body, such as NICE or a royal college. Not a legal duty, but the accepted mark of safe practice, and a departure needs a documented reason.
  5. The MR Operator keeps contact with the person throughout the scan and stops it when they report burning, pain or distress, rather than continuing through a reported heating sensation. An in-scan safety report closed with no stop and no record leaves the person with a burn nobody examined, and the colleague who sees them next with no sign it happened.

    Strong evidence: The screening record entries for any scan stop, abandoned examination, adverse event or post-scan advice (Sections 5.6 and 9): call-bell or agreed signal maintained, with the scan stopped if the patient reports burning, pain, distress or a safety concern.

    Weak evidence: Scan logs that show a completed examination and nothing else, so a reported heating sensation or a moment of panic lives only in the radiographer's memory. Abandoned or stopped scans recorded as "patient did not tolerate" with no record of what the person reported, whether the call bell or agreed signal was actually within reach, what the operator did, whether anyone looked at the skin, and what advice the person left with.

    The recognised standard from a professional or clinical body, such as NICE or a royal college. Not a legal duty, but the accepted mark of safe practice, and a departure needs a documented reason.
  6. The MR Responsible Person and the MR Safety Expert are named, separate roles, with written authority and advice staff can actually reach, not undefined safety leadership. Where the two are conflated, or there is no out-of-hours route to expert advice, the unresolved implant question on a Saturday evening has nowhere to go and the person waiting is either scanned on a guess or sent home.

    Strong evidence: The recorded delegation to the MR Responsible Person (with the written extent of delegated authority) and the appointment of the MR Safety Expert (Sections 4.1 and 8), including how staff obtain advice in and out of hours. The policy states the two must not be treated as the same role.

    Weak evidence: One person's name written into both the MR Responsible Person and MR Safety Expert boxes, or an MR Safety Expert named in a policy whose contract ended or who left two versions ago. Delegated authority summarised as "responsible for MRI safety" with no written statement of what that person may decide alone, and staff who cannot say who they would ring on a Saturday evening when an implant question is still unresolved.

    The recognised standard from a professional or clinical body, such as NICE or a royal college. Not a legal duty, but the accepted mark of safe practice, and a departure needs a documented reason.

Last verified 20 July 2026

Spotted something to improve?

These are sample templates, not the last word. If you would change a wording, or want to help us confirm a detail, tell us and we will look at it.

Related Verivius content

Want help adapting this to your service?

A Verivius consultant can read your adapted policy against the live regulation and your service shape. The work fits inside a Mock Inspection engagement or a shorter consulting brief. A 20-minute conversation is the fastest way to find out whether the fit is right.

Get started free

Free to start, no card. A 14-day trial when you subscribe.

Last reviewed 19 July 2026