Sample policy · Ophthalmology

Consent for ophthalmic procedures policy (ophthalmology)

Statutory anchor: Regulation 11 (need for consent), Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 (SI 2014/2936). The decision-making and material-risk standard is set by the Mental Capacity Act 2005, the Montgomery v Lanarkshire standard of material risk, and GMC consent guidance. · primary source

1. What the regulation says

Care and treatment of service users must only be provided with the consent of the relevant person. (Reg 11(1): the headline duty)

The full text of the regulation is at https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/2936/regulation/11. Where this policy and the regulation diverge, the regulation wins.

2. Plain-English summary

You can only provide care or treatment with the consent of the relevant person. If the service user is 16 or over and lacks capacity, follow the Mental Capacity Act 2005. If Parts 4 or 4A of the Mental Health Act 1983 apply, follow that instead. Section 5 of the MCA (acts done in connection with care or treatment) still applies underneath.

3. Purpose

Eye surgery is often elective and is chosen by the patient to improve vision, so the patient's understanding and agreement matter as much as the surgery itself. The law on consent expects a patient to be told about the material risks that matter to them and the reasonable alternatives, including doing nothing. This policy sets out how the Service takes informed consent for ophthalmic procedures, with realistic expectations about what vision the patient will have afterwards.

The Service must verify this policy against current GMC consent guidance, the Montgomery standard of material risk, and the Mental Capacity Act before adoption.

4. Scope

This policy applies to:

5. What the patient is told

For each procedure the patient is told, in plain language and in a form they can keep:

Risk information is procedure-specific. For example, cataract surgery covers the risk of posterior capsule rupture, endophthalmitis, retinal detachment, the chance the lens power is not exactly on target, and the likelihood of still needing glasses for some tasks. Intravitreal injection covers endophthalmitis and the need for urgent help if symptoms occur. The Service confirms its risk wording against current Royal College of Ophthalmologists material.

6. Realistic expectations about vision

Because patients choose eye surgery to see better, the Service is clear and honest about the visual result:

7. Two-stage consent and time to decide

For elective and refractive procedures the Service separates the discussion from the day of surgery, so the patient has time to reflect:

8. Capacity and best interests

Where a patient may lack the capacity to decide about a procedure, the Service follows the Mental Capacity Act: capacity is assessed for that decision, all practicable help is given to support the person to decide, and where they cannot, a best-interests decision is made and recorded, involving those close to the person and, where the person has no one to represent them, an independent advocate.

9. Chaperone and dignity

The patient is offered a chaperone for any examination or procedure where one is appropriate, the offer and the patient's choice are recorded, and the patient's dignity and comfort are respected throughout.

10. Recording

The consent discussion, the information given, the patient's questions, the agreed procedure and lens, and the patient's agreement are recorded. The signed consent form is one part of the record, not the whole of it; the record shows that a real discussion took place.

Operational controls to adapt

Roles and responsibilities

Ophthalmic consent procedure

  1. Confirm the exact procedure. Record the eye, procedure, laterality, lens or device where relevant, anaesthetic plan and whether the procedure is elective or urgent.
  2. Check capacity and communication needs. Identify interpreter, accessible-information, advocate, best-interests or representative involvement before the decision is taken.
  3. Explain realistic outcomes. Discuss expected visual benefit, likely need for glasses or further treatment, limits of the procedure, and what happens if the patient chooses no treatment.
  4. Discuss material risks. Cover risks that matter to this patient and procedure, including sight-threatening complications and the chance of further surgery or treatment.
  5. Give time to decide. For elective procedures, keep the consent discussion separate from the procedure date unless a clinical reason is recorded.
  6. Confirm the patient still agrees. Reconfirm consent on the day of the procedure and pause if the patient is unsure, distressed or asks new questions.
  7. Link consent to theatre checks. The consent form, procedure booking, eye marking and surgical safety checklist must all match before the procedure starts.
  8. Escalate exceptions. Missing consent, wrong-eye uncertainty, capacity concerns, safeguarding concerns, complaints or alleged pressure are escalated to the clinician in charge and opened on the relevant register.

Records and register links

The consent record should include:

Consent gaps and wrong-eye concerns are opened on the incident register. Repeated documentation gaps are added to the risk register or improvement-actions register and reviewed at governance.

Training and competence

Clinicians who take consent must keep evidence of competence in consent, material-risk discussions, capacity assessment, procedure-specific risks and communication adjustments. Staff who support the pathway receive training on approved patient information, reflection periods, escalation and what they must not explain beyond their role.

11. Audit cadence

The Service checks, on a stated cadence, that:

The Registered Manager and the clinical lead review the results and record the improvement actions that follow.

12. Sources and further reading

This template is based on CQC's guidance for providers and managers, the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, and other topic-specific legislation and guidance listed below. It is a starting point for adaptation, not a substitute for legal, clinical, HR, safeguarding or specialist professional advice.

Related reading

13. When to seek further advice

Seek specialist advice where the issue involves serious harm, safeguarding, deprivation of liberty, restraint, children, professional misconduct, controlled drugs, radiation, termination of pregnancy, infection outbreak, water safety, employment dismissal, DBS barring referral, or regulatory enforcement.

14. Document control

Version Date Author Changes
v1.1 2026-07-14 Verivius (sample) Added role ownership, consent procedure, record fields, register links, training and related reading.
v1 2026-06-10 Verivius (sample) Initial sample template, conformed to the Verivius policy standard.

This sample policy template was issued by Verivius. It is a template, not a substitute for legal advice or the tenant's own policy-development process. Where this template and live law or regulator guidance diverge, the live source wins.

Related Verivius content

Want help adapting this to your service?

A Verivius consultant can read your adapted policy against the live regulation and your service shape. The work fits inside a Mock Inspection engagement or a shorter consulting brief. A 20-minute conversation is the fastest way to find out whether the fit is right.

Get started free

Free to start, no card. A 14-day trial when you subscribe.

Last reviewed 10 June 2026