Sample policy · Domiciliary care

Service-delivery continuity policy (domiciliary care)

Statutory anchor: Regulation 17 (good governance), Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 (SI 2014/2936). This policy also engages Regulation 12 (safe care and treatment) and Regulation 18 (staffing). · primary source

1. What the regulation says

Systems or processes must be established and operated effectively to ensure compliance with the requirements in this Part. (Reg 17(1): the umbrella duty)

assess, monitor and improve the quality and safety of the services provided in the carrying on of the regulated activity (including the quality of the experience of service users in receiving those services) ... assess, monitor and mitigate the risks relating to the health, safety and welfare of service users and others who may be at risk which arise from the carrying on of the regulated activity. (Reg 17(2)(a) and (b): quality and risk)

Regulation 12 adds the safe-care duties that this policy operationalises:

Care and treatment must be provided in a safe way for service users. (Reg 12(1) (the headline duty))

assessing the risks to the health and safety of service users of receiving the care or treatment, (Reg 12(2)(a) (risk assessment))

doing all that is reasonably practicable to mitigate any such risks, (Reg 12(2)(b) (risk mitigation))

Regulation 18 adds the staffing duty that underpins continuity of cover:

Sufficient numbers of suitably qualified, competent, skilled and experienced persons must be deployed in order to meet the requirements of this Part. (Reg 18(1): the headline duty)

The full text is at https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/2936/regulation/17, https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/2936/regulation/12 and https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/2936/regulation/18. Where this policy and the regulation diverge, the regulation wins.

2. Plain-English summary

You have to run effective systems and processes to comply with everything else in Part 3. The regulation lists six things those systems must enable in particular: quality assessment and improvement, risk management, accurate service-user records, accurate employment and management records, seeking and acting on feedback, and continually evaluating and improving how you process all this. If CQC requests a written report on quality and risk plus your improvement plans, you have 28 days from the day after the request.

Care and treatment must also be provided in a safe way. Regulation 12 lists the areas a provider must address, including risk assessment, risk mitigation and staff competence, and Regulation 18 requires sufficient numbers of suitably qualified, competent, skilled and experienced staff to be deployed. Keeping essential home care going through disruption is how a service shows it is assessing and mitigating the risks to people's health, safety and welfare.

3. Purpose

People who depend on home care still need that care when things go wrong: when staff are off sick, when the weather is severe, when a phone system or rosters fail, or when demand suddenly rises. This policy sets out how the Service keeps essential care going through disruption, decides who must be visited first, and gets back to normal afterwards.

The Service must verify this policy against its commissioning contracts, which often set their own business continuity requirements, before adoption.

In practice, that continuity plan has to line up with the visit scheduling, missed and late visits policy and, where people need medicines support, the domiciliary care medication support policy template.

4. Scope

This policy applies to:

5. Roles and responsibilities

6. Continuity operating procedure

The Service follows this procedure when continuity is threatened:

  1. Identify the disruption. Record what has happened, which rounds or people are affected, and whether the disruption is office, staffing, travel, system, premises or outbreak-related.
  2. Triage critical visits. Check the care plans for time-critical medicines, food and fluids, personal care that cannot wait, people living alone, people who lack capacity, and people without informal support.
  3. Redeploy cover. Move available workers to critical visits first, using workers who know the person where possible.
  4. Communicate early. Tell the person, family or representative, commissioner and relevant professionals what is happening, what will be late, and what alternative cover is arranged.
  5. Escalate risk. Where a visit cannot be covered and the person may be harmed, seek urgent health, social care, safeguarding or emergency support.
  6. Protect records. Use the approved offline or backup record route, keeping access details and personal information secure.
  7. Record decisions. Keep a live log of decisions, affected visits, contacts, cover arranged, residual risk and actions.
  8. Recover and review. Return to normal rota, check that no person's care was missed, review impact and open improvement actions.

7. The risks this policy plans for

The Service plans for the disruptions most likely to affect home care, including:

The Service keeps its own list of risks up to date and reviews it.

8. Deciding who must be visited first

When the Service cannot deliver every visit, it protects the people who would be harmed first. The Service:

9. Keeping enough staff to cover

The Service builds resilience into its staffing:

10. Keeping in touch during disruption

During disruption the Service communicates clearly and promptly:

11. Information and systems

The Service makes sure the information needed to keep care going is available even if a system fails:

12. The business continuity plan

The Service holds a written business continuity plan that names who does what in a disruption, how decisions are made, and how the steps above are carried out. The plan is kept up to date, shared with the people who need it, and tested so that staff know it works rather than meeting it for the first time in a crisis.

13. Records and register links

During and after any disruption, the Service records what happened, what care was affected, and how it responded. The continuity record should include:

Continuity events that affect care are linked to the incident register. Repeated disruptions, weak controls or unresolved dependencies are added to the risk register. Corrective work is tracked in the improvement-actions register and reviewed through governance.

14. Training and exercises

Office staff, on-call staff and supervisors must know how to activate the continuity plan, identify critical visits, use backup records, contact commissioners and record decisions. Care workers must know how to report disruption, protect records, follow redeployment instructions and raise immediate risk to a person.

The Service tests the plan on a stated cadence using realistic scenarios such as staff sickness, system outage, severe weather and failure to reach a critical visit. Lessons from tests are recorded and actioned.

15. Audit cadence

The Service checks, on a stated cadence, that:

The Registered Manager reviews the results and records the improvement actions that follow.

16. Sources and further reading

This template is based on CQC's guidance for providers and managers, the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, and other topic-specific legislation and guidance listed below. It is a starting point for adaptation, not a substitute for legal, clinical, HR, safeguarding or specialist professional advice.

17. Related reading

18. When to seek further advice

Seek specialist advice where the issue involves serious harm, safeguarding, deprivation of liberty, restraint, children, professional misconduct, controlled drugs, radiation, termination of pregnancy, infection outbreak, water safety, employment dismissal, DBS barring referral, or regulatory enforcement.

19. Document control

Version Date Author Changes
v1.1 2026-07-12 Verivius (sample) Added continuity roles, activation procedure, live event record, register links, training and exercise controls.
v1 2026-06-10 Verivius (sample) Conformed existing draft to the Verivius policy standard; added statutory anchor, verbatim regulation text and standard source stack.

This sample policy template was issued by Verivius. It is a template, not a substitute for legal advice or the tenant's own policy-development process. Where this template and live law or regulator guidance diverge, the live source wins.

What good looks like here

Written from an ex-CQC inspector's chair, but the point is safe, well-led care your team can stand behind. Each row shows what strong evidence looks like, what thin evidence looks like, and where the expectation comes from.

Home care is delivered one person at a time, behind closed front doors, with no colleague in the room to notice when a round quietly collapses. When sickness, snow or a rostering outage takes out a run of visits, the people harmed first are the ones who cannot compensate: someone who cannot eat or drink without help, someone who cannot get out of bed or off a commode alone, someone whose teatime call is the only person who will come to the house that day. Deciding priority in advance and writing it into the care plan, rather than improvising it in a panicked hour on the phone, is what turns a bad day into a managed one. The continuity record matters for the same reason: the office cannot see harm from a distance, so with no note of which calls ran late, which were cut short and which never happened, and what was done about each, a pattern of quietly thinning care never surfaces and nobody goes back to check the person was all right. What happens in a service's worst week is what people and their families actually live through, and it is where safe practice is genuinely tested.

  1. The people whose care is critical (time-critical medicines, those who cannot eat or drink unaided, those living alone or without informal support) are identified in advance in the care plan, so staff know who must be seen first before a crisis rather than deciding in the moment.

    Strong evidence: Priority recorded in the care plan; the audit that critical people are identified in care plans and would be visited first.

    Weak evidence: Care plans that carry no priority marker at all, or the opposite failure, where every person is flagged as critical so the flag sorts nobody. Priority held only in the coordinator's head or on an office spreadsheet rather than in the care plan the worker opens on the doorstep, with no distinction between the person whose Parkinson's medicine must arrive inside a narrow window and the person on a once-daily vitamin.

    Our recommended baseline. Not a legal or regulatory requirement, but a sensible standard we suggest where the rules leave the detail to you. Adapt it to your service.
  2. The written business continuity plan is current, shared with the people who need it and tested with realistic scenarios, so staff are not meeting it for the first time in a real disruption.

    Strong evidence: The written business continuity plan and its test records with lessons recorded and actioned; the audit that the plan has been tested and lessons from any real disruption acted on.

    Weak evidence: A plan naming a registered manager who left two years ago, with an on-call number that no longer connects, sitting on the office drive unopened. Testing evidenced by an email telling staff the plan exists, no scenario exercise of any kind, and the week the snow closed half the rounds never written up or fed back into the plan.

    Our recommended baseline. Not a legal or regulatory requirement, but a sensible standard we suggest where the rules leave the detail to you. Adapt it to your service.
  3. Each disruption leaves a decision trail: what happened, who was affected, what cover was arranged, the residual risk, and any care that was late, shortened or missed, so the colleague who picks the work up next can see what is still outstanding.

    Strong evidence: The live continuity log: date, time and type of disruption, people and visits affected, triage decisions, workers redeployed, care late, shortened or missed, and lessons learned.

    Weak evidence: A bare list of missed visits with times and nothing else: no record of who made the triage decision, who was told, what cover was tried, or what risk was left standing. Logs reconstructed from memory days later, or a blanket "all visits covered" entry that hides the four calls cut to fifteen minutes and the two moved three hours late.

    Our recommended baseline. Not a legal or regulatory requirement, but a sensible standard we suggest where the rules leave the detail to you. Adapt it to your service.
  4. Staff can still reach an up-to-date list of who must be visited, with addresses, access details and key contacts, when the main system is down, so the person waiting on a critical visit is still reached.

    Strong evidence: The approved offline or backup record route, and the audit that contact lists are current and reachable offline.

    Weak evidence: Everything lives in the rostering app, so when the app is down nobody can say who must be seen or how to get into the property. A printed round list locked in an office the on-call lead cannot reach at three in the morning, key-safe codes held only in the failed system, or a backup list printed before the last three packages started and never refreshed.

    Our recommended baseline. Not a legal or regulatory requirement, but a sensible standard we suggest where the rules leave the detail to you. Adapt it to your service.
  5. An uncoverable critical visit that could harm a person triggers urgent health, social care, safeguarding or emergency escalation, not just a missed-visit note.

    Strong evidence: Safeguarding, health, emergency or commissioner escalation recorded in the continuity record, linked to the incident register where care was affected.

    Weak evidence: A continuity entry reading "no cover available, visit not delivered" with nothing after it. A person left overnight without their evening call and no urgent contact with the local authority, the district nursing team, the family or emergency services, no safeguarding consideration recorded, and no linked incident record showing anyone went back to check the person came to no harm.

    Our recommended baseline. Not a legal or regulatory requirement, but a sensible standard we suggest where the rules leave the detail to you. Adapt it to your service.

Last verified 20 July 2026

Spotted something to improve?

These are sample templates, not the last word. If you would change a wording, or want to help us confirm a detail, tell us and we will look at it.

Related Verivius content

Want help adapting this to your service?

A Verivius consultant can read your adapted policy against the live regulation and your service shape. The work fits inside a Mock Inspection engagement or a shorter consulting brief. A 20-minute conversation is the fastest way to find out whether the fit is right.

Get started free

Free to start, no card. A 14-day trial when you subscribe.

Last reviewed 10 June 2026