Sample policy · Domiciliary care

Domiciliary care medication support policy template

Statutory anchor: Regulation 12 (safe care and treatment), Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 (SI 2014/2936). This policy also engages the Mental Capacity Act 2005 where covert administration or capacity to consent is in question. · primary source

1. What the regulation says

Care and treatment must be provided in a safe way for service users. (Reg 12(1) (the headline duty))

assessing the risks to the health and safety of service users of receiving the care or treatment, (Reg 12(2)(a) (risk assessment))

doing all that is reasonably practicable to mitigate any such risks, (Reg 12(2)(b) (risk mitigation))

ensuring that persons providing care or treatment to service users have the qualifications, competence, skills and experience to do so safely, (Reg 12(2)(c) (staff competence))

the proper and safe management of medicines, (Reg 12(2)(g) (medicines management))

The full text of the regulation is at https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/2936/regulation/12. Where this policy and the regulation diverge, the regulation wins.

2. Plain-English summary

Care and treatment must be provided in a safe way. The regulation lists the areas a provider must address, including risk assessment, risk mitigation, staff competence, safe premises, safe equipment, sufficient equipment and medicines, medicines safety, infection prevention and shared-care planning. Regulation 12 is central to CQC's safety expectations.

3. Purpose

Supporting someone with their medicines in their own home is different from giving medicines in a care home. The person, or their family, may manage most of it themselves, and the Service supports only the parts they need help with. This policy sets out how the Service decides what support each person needs, how workers prompt, assist or administer medicines safely, and how the Service records it and learns from any error.

The Service must verify this policy against current NICE guidance and its own local pharmacy and prescriber arrangements before adoption.

This is the domiciliary-care version. For a cross-sector starting point, use the CQC medication policy template. For a broader audit tool that still applies to home care, use the CQC medicines management audit checklist.

4. Scope

This policy applies to:

5. Roles and responsibilities

6. Step-by-step medicines support procedure

  1. Assess the person's medicines support needs. Involve the person and identify what they manage independently, what help they want, any capacity or safeguarding concern and the risks of missed or incorrect support.
  2. Reconcile the current instructions. Obtain a current medicines list from an appropriate source, resolve discrepancies with the prescriber or pharmacy and record who confirmed each change.
  3. Agree the level of support. Record prompting, assisting or administering for each medicine, including who orders, collects, stores and disposes of it.
  4. Create the working record. Put the current care-plan instructions, medicines record, PRN protocol, time-critical window and escalation contacts where the worker can use them during the visit.
  5. Check before giving support. Confirm the person, medicine, instruction, timing, allergies, stock and any recorded change. Stop and seek advice if the record, label, medicine or person's condition does not match.
  6. Give and record the support. Follow the assessed level, preserve the person's independence and record the outcome at the time. Never sign before the support is completed.
  7. Respond to exceptions. Record and escalate a refusal, omission, late dose, unavailable medicine, side effect, swallowing difficulty, stock discrepancy or suspected error using the local clinical-advice route.
  8. Review and close the loop. Update the assessment and working records after a medicines change, discharge, error, repeated refusal, deterioration or change in what the person can manage.

7. The three levels of medicines support

The Service uses the levels of support set out in NICE NG67 and records which level applies to each medicine for each person. The level can differ from one medicine to another for the same person.

The level of support is agreed with the person, recorded in the care plan and the medicines record, and reviewed when the person's needs change.

8. Starting from what the person can do

The Service starts from the principle that a person manages their own medicines unless an assessment shows they need help. The Service does not take over more than the person needs.

9. The medicines record in the home

Where the Service administers or assists with medicines, it keeps an accurate medicines administration record (a MAR) in the person's home:

Where a person only needs prompting and manages their own medicines, the Service records that level of support rather than keeping a full MAR.

Records and evidence fields

The medicines support record should include:

10. Time-critical medicines

Some medicines must be taken close to a set time to work safely, for example medicines for Parkinson's disease, insulin, and some medicines for the heart or for epilepsy. The Service:

11. When-required (PRN) medicines

For medicines taken only when needed, such as pain relief, the Service follows a clear plan for each one:

12. Storage, ordering, collection and disposal in the home

Medicines in a person's home belong to the person and are stored in their home. The Service:

13. Controlled drugs in the home

Where a person is prescribed a controlled drug, the Service:

The Service confirms its controlled-drug arrangements against current guidance before adoption.

14. Covert medicines and the Mental Capacity Act

Giving medicine to a person without their knowledge, for example hidden in food, is covert administration. It is only ever considered where a person lacks the capacity to decide about that medicine. Before any covert administration the Service ensures:

A worker never decides to give a medicine covertly on their own.

15. Medicines errors and learning

16. Staff competency

A worker supports medicines only after training and a check that they can do it safely. The Service:

17. Audit cadence

The Service checks, on a stated cadence, that:

The Registered Manager reviews the results and records the improvement actions that follow.

Links to registers and action tracking

18. Related reading

19. Sources and further reading

This template is based on CQC's guidance for providers and managers, the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, and other topic-specific legislation and guidance listed below. It is a starting point for adaptation, not a substitute for legal, clinical, HR, safeguarding or specialist professional advice.

20. When to seek further advice

Seek specialist advice where the issue involves serious harm, safeguarding, deprivation of liberty, restraint, children, professional misconduct, controlled drugs, radiation, termination of pregnancy, infection outbreak, water safety, employment dismissal, DBS barring referral, or regulatory enforcement.

21. Document control

Version Date Author Changes
v1.1 2026-07-18 Verivius (sample) Added role ownership, the end-to-end medicines support procedure, evidence fields and register-to-action controls.
v1 2026-06-10 Verivius (sample) Conformed to the Verivius policy standard: added statutory anchor, verbatim Regulation 12 text, plain-English summary, standard source stack, advice block and document control. Original operational sections preserved and renumbered.

This sample policy template was issued by Verivius. It is a template, not a substitute for legal advice or the provider's own policy-development process. Where this template and live law or regulator guidance diverge, the live source wins.

What good looks like here

Written from an ex-CQC inspector's chair, but the point is safe, well-led care your team can stand behind. Each row shows what strong evidence looks like, what thin evidence looks like, and where the expectation comes from.

Supporting medicines in someone's own home has no drug trolley, no clinical room and no colleague to second-check. The medicines belong to the person and stay in their cupboard, the worker is alone, and the only live record sits in the home, so the office can be blind to a problem until a chart is collected. Two things go wrong quietly here. A Parkinson's disease or insulin dose lands outside its window because the call ran late, and the support drifts from prompting to administering until a person who could open their own blister pack no longer does, without anyone ever deciding it should change. The records described here are how a manager sees either drift happening between visits, which is why they matter to the person long before they matter to an inspector.

  1. The medicines administration record (a MAR) held in the person's home is actually complete, with every dose signed for or a reason recorded when it was not given, not blank boxes the next worker cannot account for.

    Strong evidence: The MAR in the home listing each medicine, dose, form and time, the worker recording each time a medicine is given or the reason it was not (refused, asleep, out) and signing each entry, and the evidence field for each prompt, assistance or administration and its outcome recorded at the time (section 9).

    Weak evidence: Charts that come back to the office with blank boxes nobody can account for, or a non-administration code entered with nothing recorded about what happened next and who was told. Weak evidence also looks like a worker signing a whole column at the end of the call or in the car rather than at the time it was given, illegible handwriting nobody has queried, and a medicines administration record that has clearly been rewritten in the office to tidy it up.

    A legal duty. This comes from legislation that applies to your service, so meeting it is not optional. The exact provision is cited beneath the badge.

    Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, reg 17(2)(c) (with reg 12(2)(g))

  2. The recorded level of support, prompting, assisting or administering, matches what workers actually do for each medicine, and consent is recorded, so the Service does not quietly take over more than the person needs.

    Strong evidence: The level of support recorded per medicine per person in the care plan and medicines record under the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline NG67, the principle of starting from what the person can manage, and the record fields for the assessed support level for each medicine and the person's consent (sections 7, 8 and 9).

    Weak evidence: A care plan that says "assist with medication" for the person as a whole rather than a level recorded for each individual medicine, or every person on the round marked as administering because that looks like the safest option. Weak evidence also looks like consent captured once at assessment and never revisited, and nothing in the file showing what the person can still do for themselves, so nobody would notice if a worker started popping a blister pack the person could open perfectly well.

    The recognised standard from a professional or clinical body, such as NICE or a royal college. Not a legal duty, but the accepted mark of safe practice, and a departure needs a documented reason.
  3. Time-critical medicines are identified and the visit is protected so the dose lands in its window, not simply labelled time-critical. A Parkinson's, insulin or epilepsy medicine can be followed from the care plan through to the visit plan.

    Strong evidence: Time-critical medicines identified in the care plan and medicines record, visits planned so these medicines can be given on time and treated as critical visits under the visit-scheduling policy, and the evidence field for time-critical windows (sections 6, 9 and 10).

    Weak evidence: The words "time critical" typed into the care plan while the rota still shows a wide call window for that visit and the scheduler has no flag against it. Weak evidence also looks like Parkinson's disease or insulin doses signed for well outside the planned window with no exception recorded, and no trail showing who was contacted or what cover was arranged when the call was running late.

    The recognised standard from a professional or clinical body, such as NICE or a royal college. Not a legal duty, but the accepted mark of safe practice, and a departure needs a documented reason.
  4. Covert administration only ever happens with a completed capacity assessment and a recorded best-interests decision involving the prescriber and pharmacist, never a worker's own decision at the point of care.

    Strong evidence: The requirement for a capacity assessment for the decision about that medicine, a recorded best-interests decision involving prescriber, pharmacist and the family or representative, the method agreed with the pharmacist, and the rule that a worker never decides to give a medicine covertly alone, under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (section 14).

    Weak evidence: A tablet crushed into yoghurt on the strength of a verbal "fine to crush" noted in the daily log, or a capacity assessment written for medicines in general rather than for the decision about that specific medicine. Weak evidence also looks like a best-interests record signed by a relative alone with no pharmacist input on the method and no prescriber named, and an arrangement that has run on with no review date and no recorded point at which it would stop.

    A legal duty. This comes from legislation that applies to your service, so meeting it is not optional. The exact provision is cited beneath the badge.

    Mental Capacity Act 2005 ss.2-3 and s.4 (with s.5), and Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, reg 11(3)

  5. A medicines error reaches a recorded outcome with a harm check and shared learning, not filed as one worker's mistake. The error appears on the incident register with the actions completed.

    Strong evidence: Same-working-day reporting of any error, near miss or recording gap, a check on whether the person has come to harm with medical help where needed, the error logged through to a recorded outcome, errors reviewed together for patterns, and the link to the incident register (sections 15 and 17).

    Weak evidence: The error appearing only in the daily notes or a supervision record and never reaching the incident register, so it cannot be counted or compared. Weak evidence also looks like an outcome field that reads "staff spoken to" or "retrained" and closes there, no record of whether the person was checked for harm or who gave clinical advice, and several similar missed or late doses across different workers with no theme drawn out and nothing changed in the way visits or supplies are organised. The same-working-day reporting cadence and the incident-register route are Verivius defaults in this policy, not statutory timescales.

    Our recommended baseline. Not a legal or regulatory requirement, but a sensible standard we suggest where the rules leave the detail to you. Adapt it to your service.
  6. Workers supporting medicines have a competence check done in practice and recorded, not just a classroom certificate, and a worker is stood down from medicines tasks when a concern arises.

    Strong evidence: Competence checked in practice not only in the classroom and repeated on a stated cadence, a record of who is competent for which level of support, removal from medicines tasks until a concern is resolved, and the training-matrix link for competency restrictions and refreshers (sections 16 and 17).

    Weak evidence: A training matrix row showing an e-learning certificate and a tick, with no observed check of the worker supporting medicines in a real home. Weak evidence also looks like the same generic sign-off wording copied across every worker's observation form, no record of which level of support each worker is signed off for, and a worker still rostered on medicines calls while a medicines concern about them is open, with nothing recorded about the decision to leave them there. Observing competence in the home, and how often that check repeats, are Verivius defaults; the underlying duty that staff be competent to provide care safely is statutory.

    Our recommended baseline. Not a legal or regulatory requirement, but a sensible standard we suggest where the rules leave the detail to you. Adapt it to your service.

Last verified 20 July 2026

Spotted something to improve?

These are sample templates, not the last word. If you would change a wording, or want to help us confirm a detail, tell us and we will look at it.

Related Verivius content

Want help adapting this to your service?

A Verivius consultant can read your adapted policy against the live regulation and your service shape. The work fits inside a Mock Inspection engagement or a shorter consulting brief. A 20-minute conversation is the fastest way to find out whether the fit is right.

Get started free

Free to start, no card. A 14-day trial when you subscribe.

Last reviewed 10 June 2026