Sample policy · Ambulance

Transfer of care and patient handover policy (ambulance)

Statutory anchor: Regulation 12 (safe care and treatment), Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 (SI 2014/2936). This policy also engages Regulation 17 (good governance) for the review of delayed-handover patterns. · primary source

1. Who this ambulance handover policy is for

This sample policy is for independent ambulance providers carrying out urgent transport, private ambulance work, high-dependency transfer, event medical cover or ambulance-supported inter-facility transfer. It focuses on the moment responsibility moves from the crew to a receiving clinician, ward, emergency department, event medical lead, care home, hospice or other responsible person.

Use this ambulance version when the handover record needs to cover clinical observations, treatment given within crew scope, deterioration during transfer, medicines or oxygen handed over, destination mismatch, delayed hospital handover, missing paperwork, wrong destination transfer, and escalation into incident review. For lower-acuity non-emergency patient transport, use the patient transport transfer-of-care and handover policy. For the wider sector evidence trail, use the ambulance and patient transport CQC compliance guide and the article on CQC compliance for ambulance and patient transport services.

This policy should sit alongside the service's patient-assessment, crew clinical-scope, vehicle safety, controlled-drugs, incident, safeguarding and duty-of-candour arrangements.

2. What the regulation says

Care and treatment must be provided in a safe way for service users. (Reg 12(1) (the headline duty))

assessing the risks to the health and safety of service users of receiving the care or treatment, (Reg 12(2)(a) (risk assessment))

doing all that is reasonably practicable to mitigate any such risks, (Reg 12(2)(b) (risk mitigation))

where responsibility for the care and treatment of service users is shared with, or transferred to, other persons, working with such other persons, service users and other appropriate persons to ensure that timely care planning takes place to ensure the health, safety and welfare of the service users. (Reg 12(2)(i) (shared / transferred responsibility))

Regulation 17 adds the governance duties that this policy relies on for pattern review of delayed and failed handovers:

Systems or processes must be established and operated effectively to ensure compliance with the requirements in this Part. (Reg 17(1): the umbrella duty)

assess, monitor and improve the quality and safety of the services provided in the carrying on of the regulated activity (including the quality of the experience of service users in receiving those services) ... assess, monitor and mitigate the risks relating to the health, safety and welfare of service users and others who may be at risk which arise from the carrying on of the regulated activity. (Reg 17(2)(a) and (b): quality and risk)

The full text is at https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/2936/regulation/12 and https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/2936/regulation/17. Where this policy and the regulation diverge, the regulation wins.

3. Plain-English summary

Care and treatment must be provided in a safe way. The regulation lists the areas a provider must address, including risk assessment, risk mitigation, staff competence, safe premises, safe equipment, sufficient equipment and medicines, medicines safety, infection prevention and shared-care planning. Where responsibility for a person's care is shared with or transferred to another service, the regulation expects timely care planning between the parties so the person's health, safety and welfare are protected. Handover is the moment that transfer happens, so a clear, factual handover and a complete records transfer are how a service shows it meets Regulation 12, while review of delayed and failed handovers is part of the good-governance duty in Regulation 17.

4. Purpose

This policy sets out how the Service completes safe transfer of care at the end of each ambulance job, records handover and responds to delayed, missing or incorrect handover.

The policy applies to planned transport, high-dependency transfer, urgent transport and event-cover work where the Service hands a patient to another service, facility or responsible person.

5. Sources to verify before adoption

6. Scope

This policy applies to:

The policy applies to NHS-contracted journeys, private journeys and subcontracted journeys where the Service remains responsible for the handover process.

7. Transfer-of-care process

Crew complete transfer of care at the receiving destination before closing the job.

7.1 Before arrival

Crew check the destination before arrival.

The check covers:

If Crew identify a destination mismatch before arrival, they contact the control point before continuing unless stopping would create greater risk.

7.2 Verbal handover

Crew give a verbal handover to the receiving clinician, receiving staff member or agreed responsible person.

The handover includes:

Crew keep the handover factual and concise. They do not add information they have not received or directly observed.

7.3 Documentation handover

Crew check that required documentation has moved with the patient.

Documentation may include:

Crew record what documentation was handed over, who received it and any missing paperwork.

7.4 Handover after event cover

For event-cover work, Crew hand over to the receiving ambulance service, emergency department, event medical lead or other agreed receiving service.

The record includes:

The Service does not close the event record until the receiving route and handover have been documented.

8. Delayed handover

The Service treats delayed handover as a governance issue and a possible patient-safety issue.

Where handover is delayed for more than 30 minutes, Crew record:

The Operations Manager escalates repeated delayed handovers at the same receiving facility to the commissioner or relevant contact where the contract allows it. The Registered Manager reviews patterns as Regulation 17 governance evidence.

9. Missing paperwork and wrong destination transfer

9.1 Missing handover paperwork

If required paperwork is missing, Crew do not invent or reconstruct clinical information.

Crew:

The review checks whether the booking process, collection process or referring facility caused the gap.

9.2 Wrong destination transfer

If Crew identify a wrong destination before, during or after arrival, they escalate immediately.

Crew:

The Registered Manager reviews whether duty of candour, commissioner notification, safeguarding, complaint handling or CQC notification advice is needed.

10. Responsibilities

11. Recording requirements

The Service keeps the following records:

Records are kept in the Service governance records and are available for internal review, CQC review, commissioner review and external review where required.

12. Audit cadence

The Service uses the following Verivius default audit rhythm unless current CQC, JRCALC, NHS England, commissioner or local source material requires a different rhythm:

Audit findings are recorded as improvement actions with an owner and review date.

13. Version control and review date

The Service keeps a controlled copy of this policy. The footer or document-control table records:

14. Related records

Review cadence: annual or on regulatory change, whichever sooner. Owner: Registered Manager.

15. Sources and further reading

This template is based on CQC's guidance for providers and managers, the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, and other topic-specific legislation and guidance listed below. It is a starting point for adaptation, not a substitute for legal, clinical, HR, safeguarding or specialist professional advice.

16. When to seek further advice

Seek specialist advice where the issue involves serious harm, safeguarding, deprivation of liberty, restraint, children, professional misconduct, controlled drugs, radiation, termination of pregnancy, infection outbreak, water safety, employment dismissal, DBS barring referral, or regulatory enforcement.

17. Document control

Version Date Author Changes
v1 2026-06-10 Verivius (sample) Conformed to the Verivius policy standard. Added the verbatim Regulation 12 and Regulation 17 quotes, plain-English summary, sources and further reading, and document control. Original purpose, scope, transfer-of-care process, delayed-handover, missing-paperwork, responsibilities, recording, audit, version-control and related-records sections preserved and renumbered.
v1.1 2026-07-09 Verivius (sample) Clarified ambulance-specific handover intent, separated this page from the patient transport handover template, and added internal links. No regulatory claims changed.

This sample policy template was issued by Verivius. It is a template, not a substitute for legal advice or the provider's own policy-development process. Where this template and live law or regulator guidance diverge, the live source wins.

What a CQC inspector checks

The same requirement seen through an ex-CQC-inspector's eyes: what they actually ask to see, and the gap they are testing for.

  1. Whether a completed handover is recorded against each job before it is closed, not a verbal handover that leaves no trace once the crew move on.

    Evidence: The handover completion record the crew log per job (destination, receiving contact and documents handed over), which the platform captures before the job is closed under the per-job audit rhythm.

  2. Whether handover delays are captured and reviewed for pattern by receiving facility, not tolerated shift after shift and forgotten.

    Evidence: The delayed-handover record (arrival time, time handover completed, reason for delay, patient condition during the wait, escalation calls and welfare needs met) and the Registered Manager's quarterly pattern review by facility as Regulation 17 governance evidence.

  3. Whether the record shows which documents actually moved with the patient and who received them, not a bare 'handed over' with no detail.

    Evidence: The documentation-handover record listing what documentation was handed over, who received it and any missing paperwork, including resuscitation and advance care planning documents where supplied.

  4. Whether a wrong destination or missing clinical paperwork was opened as an incident and escalated, not reconstructed by the crew to fill the gap.

    Evidence: The incident record for a wrong-destination transfer or missing paperwork, plus the Registered Manager's review of whether the duty of candour (Regulation 20) or a separate CQC notification applies; the policy bars crew from inventing or reconstructing clinical information.

  5. Whether the verbal handover stays factual and confined to what the crew received or directly observed, not padded with second-hand detail.

    Evidence: The verbal-handover content (patient identity, treatment and changes during the job, and any deterioration, refusal, delay or incident), which the policy requires to be factual and limited to what was received or directly observed.

Related Verivius content

Want help adapting this to your service?

A Verivius consultant can read your adapted policy against the live regulation and your service shape. The work fits inside a Mock Inspection engagement or a shorter consulting brief. A 20-minute conversation is the fastest way to find out whether the fit is right.

Get started free

Free to start, no card. A 14-day trial when you subscribe.

Last reviewed 10 June 2026