Sample policy · Termination of pregnancy

Consent and reflection policy (termination of pregnancy)

Statutory anchor: Regulation 11 (need for consent), Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 (SI 2014/2936). This policy also engages the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and, for the provider's statutory termination obligations, the Abortion Act 1967, the Abortion Regulations 1991 and the Care Quality Commission (Registration) Regulations 2009 (Reg 20, requirements relating to termination of pregnancies). · primary source

1. What the regulation says

Care and treatment of service users must only be provided with the consent of the relevant person. (Regulation 11(1))

The full text of Regulation 11 is at https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/2936/regulation/11. Where this policy and the regulation diverge, the regulation wins.

The provider's separate statutory termination obligations sit in the Abortion Act 1967, the Abortion Regulations 1991 (HSA1/HSA4 certification and the register of terminations) and the Care Quality Commission (Registration) Regulations 2009, Regulation 20, which requires that, unless two certificates of opinion have been received in respect of the service user, no termination of pregnancy is carried out and no fee is demanded or accepted from a service user (Reg 20(2)). Recent legislative changes may affect the criminal-law position for women in England and Wales who end their own pregnancies. Providers must verify the current primary legislation before publishing any patient-facing wording. This does not alter the provider's obligations under the Abortion Act 1967, the Abortion Regulations 1991, the HSA1/HSA4 process or the CQC Registration Regulations unless primary legislation says so.

2. Plain-English summary

You can only provide care or treatment with the consent of the relevant person. If the service user is 16 or over and lacks capacity, follow the Mental Capacity Act 2005. If Parts 4 or 4A of the Mental Health Act 1983 apply, follow that instead. Section 5 of the MCA (acts done in connection with care or treatment) still applies underneath.

For termination of pregnancy, consent is held to a higher communication standard than most clinical procedures because of the gestational-age dependency, the statutory framework, and the particular sensitivity around coercion and capacity.

3. Purpose

This policy sets out how the Service obtains valid, voluntary, informed consent for termination of pregnancy and how it manages reflection time and capacity assessment.

Termination consent is held to a higher communication standard than most clinical procedures because of the gestational-age dependency, the statutory framework, and the particular sensitivity around coercion and capacity.

4. Scope

This policy applies to:

Before adoption, the Service must insert its current treatment pathways, approved patient information, consent and HSA1 forms, named safeguarding route, interpreter arrangements, record location and staff authorisation process. Remove any pathway or role the Service does not provide.

5. Roles and responsibilities

6. Operational consent procedure

  1. Confirm the person and proposed pathway. Use the Service's identity checks, confirm gestational age and establish which treatment and incidental procedures are being considered.
  2. Give current information. Explain what will happen, material risks, expected effects, alternatives, aftercare and how to obtain urgent help, using communication support where needed.
  3. Check understanding and capacity. Invite questions, ask the patient to explain the decision in their own words and complete a decision-specific capacity or Gillick-competence assessment where indicated.
  4. Check that the decision is voluntary. Give the patient an opportunity to speak without an accompanying person and follow the safeguarding route if coercion or exploitation is suspected.
  5. Offer reflection without imposing delay. Record the time offered, whether the patient wants more time and any later conversation. No mandatory cooling-off period is created by this policy.
  6. Record consent and complete the statutory pathway. Complete the consent record and any separate HSA1 certification steps required for the pathway. A signed form does not replace the conversation.
  7. Reconfirm before treatment. Immediately before treatment, check that the patient still agrees and that the planned procedure matches the consent record. Stop if consent is withdrawn or becomes unclear.

7. The consent conversation

A trained clinician conducts the consent conversation. The discussion covers:

The clinician answers the patient's questions. The Service does not impose a minimum number of conversations; one conversation is sufficient if the patient is clear, but the patient may take additional reflection time at their request (section 8).

8. Reflection time

The Abortion Act 1967 does NOT impose a statutory cooling-off period. The Service's policy is to:

Where the patient explicitly states they have already reflected and want to proceed, the Service does not require an artificial delay. Adding a delay against the patient's wishes is itself a violation of patient autonomy.

9. Capacity assessment

Capacity is assumed in adults aged 16 and over unless there is reason to believe otherwise (Mental Capacity Act 2005, sections 1 to 3).

Where capacity is in doubt, the assessing clinician documents:

If the patient is assessed as lacking capacity for this decision, the termination cannot proceed on the basis of their consent. The Service follows the best-interests pathway under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and consults with the patient's representatives or seeks judicial input where appropriate. The Service's clinical lead is involved in every such case.

10. Patients under 18

10.1 Patients aged 16 and 17

Presumed competent to consent. Parental involvement is encouraged but not required. The Service applies the same consent standard as for adults. Safeguarding considerations may still apply (see safeguarding policy).

10.2 Patients aged under 16

For under-16s, the clinician must assess Gillick competence for the specific decision. Fraser principles may be relevant where contraception or sexual-health advice is involved, but they must not be applied mechanically as a substitute for a full Gillick competence assessment, safeguarding assessment and termination-specific consent process. The assessing clinician documents:

Where Gillick competence is not established, or a safeguarding concern arises, the Service does NOT proceed on the patient's sole consent and follows the safeguarding pathway under Working Together to Safeguard Children 2026 and local safeguarding children procedures.

10.3 Patients under 13

Patients under 13 are not legally able to consent to sexual activity. Any patient presenting under 13 is referred under the child-safeguarding pathway in the safeguarding policy. The clinical question is then secondary to the safeguarding response.

11. Coercion screening

Every consent conversation includes screening for coercion or pressure from a partner, family member, or third party. The Service's clinicians are trained to:

Where coercion is disclosed or suspected, the safeguarding policy applies.

12. Information provision

The Service provides written information to the patient covering:

Patient-facing written information is reviewed annually by the Service's clinical lead and is updated whenever clinical evidence or regulatory guidance changes.

13. Documenting consent

The consent record includes:

Consent records are retained per the Service's records retention policy and the Abortion Regulations 1991 retention requirements.

14. Training

All clinicians taking consent for termination complete:

15. Audit and monitoring

The clinical lead audits consent records monthly. The sample includes every case involving a patient under 16, a capacity concern, suspected coercion or withdrawn consent, plus 10 other completed pathways or all completed pathways if fewer than 10 occurred.

The audit checks that information matched the pathway, material risks and alternatives were discussed, reflection was offered, voluntariness and capacity were considered, consent was reconfirmed and the clinician was authorised. It identifies the staff member responsible for each correction and sets a due date. Findings are reviewed by the Registered Manager and recorded in the governance action plan. Overdue actions, repeated omissions or a concern that consent was not valid are escalated immediately. Closure requires evidence that the change was made and a follow-up sample showing that it worked.

After three consecutive monthly audits meet the Service's agreed standard, the routine-record sample may move to quarterly. Exception cases remain subject to monthly review.

16. Review

This policy is reviewed at least annually and whenever GMC consent guidance, RCOG best-practice guidance, or the Abortion Act 1967 materially changes.

17. Related policies in this pack

18. Sources and further reading

This template is based on CQC's guidance for providers and managers, the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, and other topic-specific legislation and guidance listed below. It is a starting point for adaptation, not a substitute for legal, clinical, HR, safeguarding or specialist professional advice.

19. When to seek further advice

Seek specialist advice where the issue involves serious harm, safeguarding, deprivation of liberty, restraint, children, professional misconduct, controlled drugs, radiation, termination of pregnancy, infection outbreak, water safety, employment dismissal, DBS barring referral, or regulatory enforcement.

20. Document control

Version Date Author Changes
v1.1 2026-07-19 Verivius (sample) Added role ownership, an operational consent workflow, risk-based audit cadence, local adoption controls and related policies.
v1 2026-06-10 Verivius (sample) Conformed existing draft to the Verivius policy standard; added statutory anchor, verbatim Regulation 11 quote, plain-English summary, source stack and document control. Original sections and sources preserved.

This sample policy template was issued by Verivius. It is a template, not a substitute for legal advice or the provider's own policy-development process. Where this template and live law or regulator guidance diverge, the live source wins.

Related Verivius content

Want help adapting this to your service?

A Verivius consultant can read your adapted policy against the live regulation and your service shape. The work fits inside a Mock Inspection engagement or a shorter consulting brief. A 20-minute conversation is the fastest way to find out whether the fit is right.

Get started free

Free to start, no card. A 14-day trial when you subscribe.

Last reviewed 10 June 2026