Sample policy · Reg 14

Nutrition and Hydration Policy

Statutory anchor: Regulation 14 (meeting nutritional and hydration needs), Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 (SI 2014/2936). This policy also engages Regulation 9 (person-centred care), Regulation 10 (dignity and respect), Regulation 11 (need for consent), Regulation 12 (safe care and treatment), Regulation 17 (good governance) and the Mental Capacity Act 2005. · primary source

Download the PDF

The PDF version of this template is the same content, formatted for adaptation in your document control system. The disclaimer above is repeated on the PDF cover.

Verivius pack version v1.1, 2026-07-19

1. What the regulation says

The nutritional and hydration needs of service users must be met. (Reg 14(1) (the headline duty))

receipt by a service user of suitable and nutritious food and hydration which is adequate to sustain life and good health, (Reg 14(4)(a) (suitable + nutritious food))

receipt by a service user of parenteral nutrition and dietary supplements when prescribed by a health care professional, (Reg 14(4)(b) (parenteral nutrition + dietary supplements))

the meeting of any reasonable requirements of a service user for food and hydration arising from the service user's preferences or their religious or cultural background, (Reg 14(4)(c) (preferences / religious / cultural needs))

if necessary, support for a service user to eat or drink. (Reg 14(4)(d) (support to eat or drink))

Regulation 14 applies where care or treatment involves accommodation, an overnight stay, or where meeting nutrition or hydration needs is part of the care or treatment arrangements. It does not apply where meeting those needs would breach Regulation 11 or would not be in the person's best interests.

The full text of the regulation is at https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/2936/regulation/14. Where this policy and the regulation diverge, the regulation wins.

2. Plain-English summary

When you provide accommodation, host an overnight stay, or otherwise have arrangements that include feeding service users, you have to meet their nutritional and hydration needs. The regulation defines those needs to include suitable and nutritious food, prescribed nutrition where relevant, accommodation of religious or cultural requirements, and if necessary support to eat or drink.

This policy also engages Regulation 9 (person-centred care), which lists nine specific things you have to do to deliver person-centred care, including assessment with the service user, designing care to meet their preferences, involving them and the people supporting them in decisions, and considering well-being when meeting nutritional and hydration needs. It engages Regulation 12 (safe care and treatment), which lists the areas a provider must address, including risk assessment, risk mitigation, staff competence and safe care, so that poor intake, dehydration, swallowing risk and fasting risk are managed safely.

3. Purpose

The purpose of this policy is to make sure that [Service Name] assesses and meets people's nutrition and hydration needs where this is part of the service's care or treatment arrangements.

This policy is not intended to impose a care-home-style food-service system on a consultation-only service. It applies where nutrition or hydration is part of safe care, treatment, accommodation, recovery, personal care, fasting, dietary support, supplements, parenteral nutrition or ongoing monitoring.

4. Policy warning

The service must not ignore nutrition or hydration risk where it forms part of the person's care or treatment.

Failure to assess, monitor or respond to poor intake, dehydration, weight loss, swallowing risk, fasting risk, dietary restrictions or prescribed supplements can create avoidable harm.

Where a person refuses nutrition or hydration, staff must respect valid consent and follow the Mental Capacity Act 2005 where the person may lack capacity for the decision.

5. Scope

This policy applies where the service:

It does not apply to a purely consultation-only service except where nutrition, hydration, fasting, clinical risk or recovery arrangements form part of the care.

Local adoption decisions

Before adoption, the provider records:

6. Principles

The service will:

7. Responsibilities

The provider is responsible for ensuring suitable resources, food, drinks, equipment, staffing and governance arrangements where nutrition or hydration is part of the service.

The Registered Manager is responsible for ensuring assessment, monitoring, escalation and audit systems are in place.

Clinical leads or senior staff are responsible for reviewing high-risk cases, prescribed supplements, swallowing concerns, fasting instructions, deterioration or refusal.

All staff are responsible for following the person's nutrition and hydration plan, reporting concerns and recording accurately.

8. Nutrition and hydration assessment and response workflow

  1. Confirm responsibility. At referral, admission or treatment planning, staff record whether the service will assess, provide, support, monitor or only give instructions about nutrition or hydration.
  2. Assess. A competent worker identifies preferences, independence, risks, clinical needs, capacity and the support or equipment required, using the provider's adopted tool where applicable.
  3. Plan. The person and relevant representatives or professionals agree outcomes, support, monitoring, escalation thresholds and review dates. Consent or best-interests decisions are recorded.
  4. Provide or support. Staff follow the plan, prescribed instructions, allergy controls, fasting requirements and safe-swallowing guidance within their competence.
  5. Monitor. Intake, weight, symptoms, tolerance and other agreed measures are recorded at the stated frequency. Missed or unreliable monitoring is escalated rather than left blank.
  6. Escalate and refer. Staff act on the local thresholds for poor intake, dehydration, weight change, dysphagia, choking, deterioration, refusal or fasting risk, and record advice and referrals.
  7. Review and close. The plan is updated after changes, incidents, hospital contact or specialist advice. Actions remain open until responsibility and follow-up are confirmed.

Where this policy applies, the service must assess nutrition and hydration needs during initial assessment and ongoing review.

Assessment should consider:

The assessment must be completed by people with suitable skills and knowledge for the service type.

9. Care plan

Where a nutrition or hydration need is identified, the service must record a plan.

The plan should include:

Staff must follow the most recent plan.

10. Food and drink provision

Where the service provides food or drink, it must be suitable, nutritious and sufficient for the person's needs.

Arrangements must consider:

Water must be available and accessible where the service is responsible for care arrangements.

11. Support to eat and drink

Where a person needs support to eat or drink, staff must provide support safely and respectfully.

Support may include:

Staff must not rush, force, pressure or shame a person into eating or drinking.

12. Monitoring intake

The service must monitor food or fluid intake where the assessment shows risk.

Monitoring may be required where there is:

Records must show what was offered, what was taken, concerns, action taken and escalation.

13. Weight, malnutrition and dehydration risk

Where relevant, the service must monitor weight and nutritional risk in line with the person's needs and professional advice.

Concerns requiring escalation may include:

Escalation may include GP, dietitian, speech and language therapist, pharmacist, nurse, urgent care or emergency services depending on risk.

14. Prescribed supplements and parenteral nutrition

Prescribed nutritional supplements and parenteral nutrition must be managed through safe systems.

The plan must record:

Parenteral nutrition or clinically complex nutritional support must only be managed by appropriately trained, competent and authorised staff.

15. Fasting before procedures

Where fasting is required before procedure, sedation, anaesthesia, imaging or treatment, the service must provide clear instructions.

The record must show:

If fasting creates safety risk, the person must be reviewed by an appropriate clinician.

16. Refusal of food or drink

A person with capacity may refuse food or drink.

Staff must:

Staff must not hide, force or disguise food or drink unless there is a lawful and recorded best-interests process and professional advice supports the approach.

17. Cultural, religious and ethical requirements

The service must identify and meet reasonable food and hydration requirements arising from cultural, religious, ethical or personal preferences.

Where a preference creates a clinical risk or cannot reasonably be met, staff must explain the issue, consider alternatives and record the discussion.

18. End-of-life care

Nutrition and hydration at end of life must be managed sensitively and in line with the person's wishes, consent, capacity and clinical advice.

The service must consider:

The End-of-Life Care Policy must be followed where applicable.

19. Records

Records must include:

Records must be accurate, timely and available to staff who need them.

Nutrition and hydration incidents, safeguarding concerns, complaints, specialist referrals and capacity decisions are cross-linked to the care record. Audit findings and controls are linked to the risk, training, audit and improvement-actions registers with an owner and review date.

20. Staff training

Staff must receive training appropriate to their role.

Training may include:

Training must be recorded.

21. Audit and governance

The Registered Manager must audit nutrition and hydration arrangements at least annually, and more often where risk is high.

The audit should check:

Findings must be recorded in the audit register. Corrective actions are assigned in the improvement-actions register, unresolved or systemic concerns are linked to the risk register, and competence gaps are linked to the training matrix.

22. Review

This policy will be reviewed annually, or sooner following a CQC finding, nutrition or hydration incident, choking incident, safeguarding concern, complaint theme, change in service model, food-service change or legal or source update.

23. Related policies in this pack

24. Sources and further reading

This template is based on CQC's guidance for providers and managers, the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, and other topic-specific legislation and guidance listed below. It is a starting point for adaptation, not a substitute for legal, clinical, HR, safeguarding or specialist professional advice.

25. When to seek further advice

Seek specialist advice where the issue involves serious harm, safeguarding, deprivation of liberty, restraint, children, professional misconduct, controlled drugs, radiation, termination of pregnancy, infection outbreak, water safety, employment dismissal, DBS barring referral, or regulatory enforcement.

Seek specialist advice in particular where the issue involves choking risk, dysphagia, malnutrition, dehydration, significant weight loss, refusal of nutrition or hydration, fasting risk, diabetes, eating disorder, end-of-life care, parenteral nutrition, prescribed supplements, capacity dispute or serious deterioration.

26. Document control

Version Date Author Changes
v1 2026-06-10 Verivius (sample) Conformed new cross-cutting draft to the Verivius policy standard.
v1.1 2026-07-19 Verivius (sample) Added a responsibility-to-review operating workflow, local service decisions, governance links and the related policy set needed to run nutrition and hydration controls safely.

This sample policy template was issued by Verivius. It is a template, not a substitute for legal advice or the provider's own policy-development process. Where this template and live law or regulator guidance diverge, the live source wins.

What good looks like here

Written from an ex-CQC inspector's chair, but the point is safe, well-led care your team can stand behind. Each row shows what strong evidence looks like, what thin evidence looks like, and where the expectation comes from.

Nutrition and hydration harm builds quietly. Nobody witnesses the moment a person becomes dehydrated or malnourished, because it accumulates across shifts, out-of-reach beakers and meals returned untouched, which is why the intake record works as a clinical instrument rather than paperwork. Swallowing risk behaves in the opposite way, since a wrongly textured meal or an unthickened drink can cause harm in a single mouthful, so the distance between the current speech and language therapy advice and what is actually put in front of the person matters far more than whether a plan exists somewhere. There is also the person's own experience to hold on to. Being rushed at a meal, offered food they cannot eat for religious or cultural reasons, or helped in a way that strips the dignity out of eating, is a failure of dignity long before it becomes a clinical one. Where the trail runs unbroken from assessment to plan to intake record to referral and back into the plan, the service can show it noticed something, acted on it and changed what happens at the next mealtime.

  1. Food and fluid intake is recorded at the stated frequency and gaps are escalated, not left as blank rows in a fluid or food chart that hide whether a person actually ate or drank.

    Strong evidence: Monitoring records (section 12) showing what was offered, what was taken, concerns, action taken and escalation, plus the workflow requirement (section 8, step 5) that missed or unreliable monitoring is escalated rather than left blank.

    Weak evidence: Fluid charts that stop mid-afternoon, run to a 24-hour total nobody ever adds up, or are filled in at the end of a shift in one hand and one pen. The tell is a run of blank rows with nothing beside them to say who noticed, what was offered instead, or that the person declined.

    Our recommended baseline. Not a legal or regulatory requirement, but a sensible standard we suggest where the rules leave the detail to you. Adapt it to your service.
  2. The food and support actually delivered match the person's current plan, including texture-modified diet or thickened fluids where prescribed, not a superseded or ignored plan.

    Strong evidence: The nutrition and hydration care plan (section 9) recording assessed need, texture-modified diet or thickened fluids, support required, monitoring and escalation threshold, with the instruction that staff follow the most recent plan.

    Weak evidence: The kitchen sheet or the staff member says "soft diet" while the speech and language therapy advice in the file specifies a named texture level and thickened fluids at a stated consistency. Also weak: a care plan last reviewed before the most recent swallowing assessment, with no dated version anyone can point to as the one currently in use.

    A legal duty. This comes from legislation that applies to your service, so meeting it is not optional. The exact provision is cited beneath the badge.

    Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, reg 12(2)(a)-(b) and reg 14(1) and (4)(a)

  3. Weight loss, poor intake or signs of dehydration trigger a recorded referral, not just an entry in the notes.

    Strong evidence: Weight and nutritional-risk escalation records (section 13) showing referral to GP, dietitian, speech and language therapist, pharmacist or urgent care with the advice received recorded.

    Weak evidence: Daily notes reading "poor appetite again" or "weight down" across several weeks with no referral, no date and no name of who was contacted. Equally thin: a referral was made, but the dietitian or speech and language therapy advice that came back was never written into the plan, so what staff actually do at mealtimes has not changed.

    The recognised standard from a professional or clinical body, such as NICE or a royal college. Not a legal duty, but the accepted mark of safe practice, and a departure needs a documented reason.
  4. Food or drink is not hidden or disguised to get a person to take it unless a lawful, recorded best-interests process and professional advice support it.

    Strong evidence: Refusal records (section 16) with the capacity assessment and best-interests decision required under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 before any such approach, and safeguarding considered where neglect or coercion may be involved.

    Weak evidence: Food or drink routinely mixed into yoghurt or juice "because that is the only way she takes it", supported by nothing more than a line in a handover book or a relative's say-so. Weak evidence is no dated capacity assessment for that specific decision and no record of who was consulted in the person's best interests. Where a medicine is being disguised in food, thin evidence also has no pharmacist or prescriber advice on file.

    A legal duty. This comes from legislation that applies to your service, so meeting it is not optional. The exact provision is cited beneath the badge.

    Mental Capacity Act 2005 s.4 (with s.5), and Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, reg 11(1) and (3)

  5. Pre-procedure fasting instructions are recorded with timing and high-risk considerations (for example diabetes), not given verbally and left unrecorded.

    Strong evidence: The fasting record (section 15) capturing the instruction, reason, timing, clear-fluids position, diabetes or high-risk considerations, what to do if instructions were not followed and who to contact.

    Weak evidence: Fasting given verbally on the phone or at the door, with nothing in the record beyond "nil by mouth from midnight". Thin evidence has no reason recorded, no clear-fluids position, nothing about the person's diabetes medicines or other high-risk factors, and no note of what was done when someone arrived having eaten breakfast.

    The recognised standard from a professional or clinical body, such as NICE or a royal college. Not a legal duty, but the accepted mark of safe practice, and a departure needs a documented reason.
  6. The annual nutrition and hydration audit drives assigned actions to closure, not a completed audit filed with no follow-up.

    Strong evidence: The audit (section 21) with findings in the audit register, corrective actions assigned in the improvement-actions register, systemic concerns linked to the risk register and competence gaps linked to the training matrix (section 19).

    Weak evidence: An audit form with "compliant" ticked down most of the page, findings never carried into the improvement-actions register with a named owner and a date, and last year's audit showing the same weight-monitoring or fasting-record gap still open.

    Our recommended baseline. Not a legal or regulatory requirement, but a sensible standard we suggest where the rules leave the detail to you. Adapt it to your service.

Last verified 20 July 2026

Spotted something to improve?

These are sample templates, not the last word. If you would change a wording, or want to help us confirm a detail, tell us and we will look at it.

Related Verivius content

Want help adapting this to your service?

A Verivius consultant can read your adapted policy against the live regulation and your service shape. The work fits inside a Mock Inspection engagement or a shorter consulting brief. A 20-minute conversation is the fastest way to find out whether the fit is right.

Get started free

Free to start, no card. A 14-day trial when you subscribe.

Last reviewed 19 July 2026