Sample policy · Dermatology

Dermoscopy and lesion documentation policy (dermatology)

Statutory anchor: Regulation 17 (good governance), Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 (SI 2014/2936). This policy also engages Regulation 12 (safe care and treatment). The professional and data-protection primaries are British Association of Dermatologists / Primary Care Dermatology Society guidance on dermoscopy and clinical photography, and the UK GDPR and Data Protection Act 2018 for clinical images as special-category personal data. · primary source

1. What the regulation says

Systems or processes must be established and operated effectively to ensure compliance with the requirements in this Part. (Reg 17(1): the umbrella duty)

maintain securely an accurate, complete and contemporaneous record in respect of each service user, including a record of the care and treatment provided to the service user and of decisions taken in relation to the care and treatment provided. (Reg 17(2)(c): accurate service-user record)

Regulation 12 adds the safe-care duties this policy operationalises:

Care and treatment must be provided in a safe way for service users. (Reg 12(1) (the headline duty))

assessing the risks to the health and safety of service users of receiving the care or treatment, (Reg 12(2)(a) (risk assessment))

doing all that is reasonably practicable to mitigate any such risks, (Reg 12(2)(b) (risk mitigation))

The full text is at https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/2936/regulation/17 and https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/2936/regulation/12. Where this policy and the regulation diverge, the regulation wins.

2. Plain-English summary

You have to run effective systems and processes to comply with everything else in Part 3. The regulation lists six things those systems must enable in particular: quality assessment and improvement, risk management, accurate service-user records, accurate employment and management records, seeking and acting on feedback, and continually evaluating and improving how you process all this. If CQC requests a written report on quality and risk plus your improvement plans, you have 28 days from the day after the request. Care and treatment must also be provided in a safe way: Regulation 12 lists the areas a provider must address, including risk assessment, risk mitigation and staff competence, which apply directly to using dermoscopy and recording lesions so they can be compared safely over time.

3. Purpose

Dermoscopy improves the accuracy of skin lesion diagnosis, and good documentation, including clinical images, lets a clinician see whether a lesion has changed over time. Because those images are sensitive personal data, they must be handled carefully. This policy sets out how the Service uses dermoscopy, records lesions and stores clinical images safely.

The Service must verify this policy against current British Association of Dermatologists guidance and data protection law before adoption.

4. Sources to verify before adoption

5. Scope

This policy applies to:

6. Using dermoscopy

7. Clinical and dermoscopic images

8. Lesion records that support comparison

The Service records each lesion clearly enough to compare it over time:

9. Protecting images as personal data

Clinical images are sensitive personal data and are protected accordingly:

10. Consent for any wider use

An image is used only for the purpose the patient agreed to. Any wider use, such as teaching or publication, needs separate, specific and informed consent, and the patient can decline without affecting their care.

Operational controls to adapt

Roles and responsibilities

Dermoscopy and lesion-documentation procedure

  1. Confirm identity and consent. Confirm the patient, explain why the image or dermoscopy record is needed, and record consent for clinical use.
  2. Identify the lesion. Record precise anatomical site, side, size, body-map reference or lesion number, and whether other lesions are being monitored.
  3. Capture the minimum image set. Take an overview image, close-up clinical image and dermoscopic image where dermoscopy is used, unless the reason for not doing so is recorded.
  4. Record clinical features. Document symptoms, duration, change, patient concern, risk factors, clinical appearance and dermoscopic features.
  5. Make and record the decision. State whether the lesion is reassured, monitored, biopsied, excised or referred, and the reason for that decision.
  6. Set follow-up or referral. If monitoring is chosen, set a review date and comparison method. If cancer is suspected, use the urgent referral pathway.
  7. Protect and review images. Store images only in the approved system, check they are linked to the correct patient, and review quality and access through audit.
  8. Escalate concerns. Open an incident for image mix-up, missing image, missed cancer concern, delayed referral, data breach or failure to act on change.

Records and register links

The lesion record should include:

Missed lesion concerns, delayed referrals and image mix-ups are opened on the incident register. Image-storage weaknesses, recurring poor image quality and follow-up failures are tracked through the risk register and improvement-actions register.

11. Training

Clinicians using dermoscopy keep their competence current and are refreshed on a stated cadence. Staff who handle images are trained in consent, identification and data protection. The Service records who is competent and the next refresher date.

12. Audit cadence

The Service checks, on a stated cadence, that:

The Registered Manager and the clinical lead review the results and record the improvement actions that follow.

13. Sources and further reading

This template is based on CQC's guidance for providers and managers, the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, and other topic-specific legislation and guidance listed below. It is a starting point for adaptation, not a substitute for legal, clinical, HR, safeguarding or specialist professional advice.

Related reading

14. When to seek further advice

Seek specialist advice where the issue involves serious harm, safeguarding, deprivation of liberty, restraint, children, professional misconduct, controlled drugs, radiation, termination of pregnancy, infection outbreak, water safety, employment dismissal, DBS barring referral, or regulatory enforcement.

15. Document control

Version Date Author Changes
v1.1 2026-07-14 Verivius (sample) Added role ownership, dermoscopy workflow, record fields, register links and related reading.
v1 2026-06-10 Verivius (sample) Conformed to the Verivius policy standard: added statutory anchor, verbatim regulation quotes, plain-English summary, sources and document control. Original operational sections preserved and renumbered.

This sample policy template was issued by Verivius. It is a template, not a substitute for legal advice or the tenant's own policy-development process. Where this template and live law or regulator guidance diverge, the live source wins.

What good looks like here

Written from an ex-CQC inspector's chair, but the point is safe, well-led care your team can stand behind. Each row shows what strong evidence looks like, what thin evidence looks like, and where the expectation comes from.

Dermoscopy is one of the few areas where the record is part of the diagnostic instrument. Change over time is itself a warning sign, so a melanoma may declare itself not in a single view but in the difference between a baseline image and a review months later, and a lesion written down as "mole on back" cannot be safely compared by whoever sees the patient next. The dermatoscope carries its own hazard of false reassurance, where a benign-looking pattern quietly outweighs a patient who is saying the lesion has changed, which is why the recorded decision and the reason for it matter as much as the image. Clinical images add a second risk that is easy to underestimate: a photograph of an identifiable body site is special-category personal data under the UK GDPR, and a patient who agreed to a picture for their own care has usually not agreed to see it in a teaching slide deck or on a website. Getting this right is what lets a person with many moles be followed by more than one clinician over years without losing the thread, and it is what turns a folder of images into a genuine monitoring service rather than a filing habit. Inspection reaches the same place from the other direction, by asking to see the comparison and the action that followed it.

  1. Monitored lesions are compared against a baseline and any change is acted on, so a lesion that is changing is picked up at review rather than left in a folder of images no one revisits.

    Strong evidence: The baseline and review images with the comparison result and the action taken, recorded in the lesion record (sections 7 and 8, records and register links, audit cadence).

    Weak evidence: Baseline images sit in a folder and the review entry reads "images taken, no change" with nothing recording which baseline was actually opened, no size measurement and no side-by-side comparison result. The other common pattern is a monitoring review date that passed months ago and was only noticed when the patient rebooked for something else.

    The recognised standard from a professional or clinical body, such as NICE or a royal college. Not a legal duty, but the accepted mark of safe practice, and a departure needs a documented reason.
  2. A reassuring dermoscopic image does not override a worrying clinical picture: where dermoscopy is uncertain or the picture is concerning the lesion is referred or excised, and the clinician using the dermatoscope is recorded as competent to do so.

    Strong evidence: The recorded decision (reassure, monitor, biopsy, excise or refer) with its reason (section 6, procedure step 5), and the competence record with the next refresher date (training, section 11).

    Weak evidence: The record says "dermoscopy performed, benign appearance" with no stated decision (reassure, monitor, biopsy, excise or refer), no reason for it, and no note of what the patient was reporting about change. Competence is evidenced by a single attendance certificate from a course some years ago, with no refresher date and no list anyone can produce of which clinicians are signed off to use the dermatoscope.

    The recognised standard from a professional or clinical body, such as NICE or a royal college. Not a legal duty, but the accepted mark of safe practice, and a departure needs a documented reason.
  3. Clinical and dermoscopic images live only in the Service's secure system, not on personal phones, and a lost or exposed image is handled as a possible data breach.

    Strong evidence: The image storage-location and access fields, and the data-breach record raised where an image is lost or exposed (section 9, audit cadence).

    Weak evidence: Images were taken on a clinician's own phone and "deleted afterwards", with nothing in the record showing where the image now lives, who uploaded it or who has had access. A known lost or misdirected image is handled as an email conversation concluding it was probably fine, rather than being opened as a possible data breach with a record and an outcome.

    A legal duty. This comes from legislation that applies to your service, so meeting it is not optional. The exact provision is cited beneath the badge.

    UK GDPR Article 5(1)(f) and Article 32 (security of processing of special category health data); Article 33(5) (controller shall document any personal data breach)

  4. An image is taken with consent recorded for clinical use, and any teaching or publication use carries its own separate, specific consent the patient can decline without affecting their care.

    Strong evidence: The consent-for-clinical-use field and the separate teaching or publication consent field in the lesion record (sections 7 and 10, records and register links).

    Weak evidence: Consent is a single tick reading "consent obtained", or a general photography line buried in the registration form, doing duty for both clinical use and teaching use. Images then appear in a training slide deck or on the website with no separate consent record and nothing showing the patient was told they could say no without it affecting their care.

    The recognised standard from a professional or clinical body, such as NICE or a royal college. Not a legal duty, but the accepted mark of safe practice, and a departure needs a documented reason.
  5. Each lesion is recorded precisely enough that the next clinician can find and compare the same lesion, not left to a vague site.

    Strong evidence: The lesion record's exact anatomical site, side and body-map reference or lesion number, with a body map or numbering used where a patient has many lesions (section 8, procedure step 2).

    Weak evidence: Entries read "mole on back" or "lesion on arm": no side, no size, no lesion number and no body-map reference. For a patient with many moles there is no body map or numbering at all, so the next clinician cannot be sure they are examining the same lesion, and close-up images arrive with no overview shot to locate them on the body.

    The recognised standard from a professional or clinical body, such as NICE or a royal college. Not a legal duty, but the accepted mark of safe practice, and a departure needs a documented reason.

Last verified 20 July 2026

Spotted something to improve?

These are sample templates, not the last word. If you would change a wording, or want to help us confirm a detail, tell us and we will look at it.

Related Verivius content

Want help adapting this to your service?

A Verivius consultant can read your adapted policy against the live regulation and your service shape. The work fits inside a Mock Inspection engagement or a shorter consulting brief. A 20-minute conversation is the fastest way to find out whether the fit is right.

Get started free

Free to start, no card. A 14-day trial when you subscribe.

Last reviewed 10 June 2026