Sample policy · Reg 12

Clinical Waste and Sharps Safety Policy

Statutory anchor: Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974, the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 (COSHH), the Health and Safety (Sharp Instruments in Healthcare) Regulations 2013, the Environmental Protection Act 1990 and waste regulations are the primary law for this policy. It also engages Regulation 12 (safe care and treatment), Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 (SI 2014/2936), which is quoted below. · primary source

Download the PDF

The PDF version of this template is the same content, formatted for adaptation in your document control system. The disclaimer above is repeated on the PDF cover.

Download PDFTalk to a consultant

Verivius pack version v1.1, 2026-07-21

1. What the regulation says

Care and treatment must be provided in a safe way for service users. (Reg 12(1) (the headline duty))

assessing the risks to the health and safety of service users of receiving the care or treatment, (Reg 12(2)(a) (risk assessment))

doing all that is reasonably practicable to mitigate any such risks, (Reg 12(2)(b) (risk mitigation))

ensuring that the premises used by the service provider are safe to use for their intended purpose and are used in a safe way, (Reg 12(2)(d) (premises safety))

assessing the risk of, and preventing, detecting and controlling the spread of, infections, including those that are health care associated, (Reg 12(2)(h) (infection control))

The full text of the regulation is at https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/2936/regulation/12. Where this policy and the regulation diverge, the regulation wins.

2. Plain-English summary

Care and treatment must be provided in a safe way. The regulation lists the areas a provider must address, including risk assessment, risk mitigation, staff competence, safe premises, safe equipment, sufficient equipment and medicines, medicines safety, infection prevention and shared-care planning. Alongside this, the safe handling and disposal of clinical waste and sharps is governed by health and safety law, COSHH and waste law, which set out the provider's duties to protect staff, people using the service and the public from the hazards that waste and sharps create.

3. Purpose

The purpose of this policy is to make sure that clinical waste, healthcare waste, sharps and related materials are managed safely, legally and in a way that protects people using the service, staff, visitors, contractors and the public.

Clinical waste and sharps are a safety, infection-control and governance risk. Poor segregation, unsafe storage, overfilled sharps bins, missing waste documentation or poor response to sharps injuries can expose people to avoidable harm.

This policy supports safe care and treatment, infection prevention and control, premises safety, health and safety law, waste-management duties and good governance.

4. Policy warning

Sharps must be disposed of immediately at the point of use into the correct sharps container.

Needles must not be re-sheathed, bent, broken, passed hand-to-hand unnecessarily, left on trays, placed in ordinary waste, or carried loose.

Clinical waste must not be mixed with domestic waste unless this is allowed by the service's waste-segregation procedure and waste contractor arrangements.

Where a sharps injury, blood or body-fluid exposure, incorrect disposal or waste-storage failure occurs, staff must escalate immediately and complete an incident record.

5. Scope

This policy applies to:

6. Principles

The service will ensure that:

7. Responsibilities

The Registered Manager is responsible for ensuring safe waste and sharps arrangements are in place and audited.

Clinical or operational leads are responsible for making sure correct containers and procedures are available in treatment, care, vehicle or visit areas.

All staff are responsible for segregating waste correctly, using sharps safely, reporting concerns and following this policy.

Contractors are responsible for collecting, transporting and disposing of waste in line with their legal duties and contract.

The provider remains responsible for ensuring that waste arrangements are safe and suitable.

8. Waste segregation

Waste must be segregated at the point it is produced.

The service must maintain a waste-segregation guide that reflects:

Staff must not guess the waste stream. If unsure, they must ask a senior person before disposal.

8.1 Operational waste workflow

For each waste stream, Staff follow this sequence:

  1. Identify the waste where it is produced, using the adopted segregation guide and any medicines, infection or hazardous-property information.
  2. Place it immediately in the correct colour-coded, labelled and compatible bag or container. Sharps go directly into the correct assembled sharps container at the point of use.
  3. Replace, close and label the container at the marked fill line or earlier if damaged, contaminated externally or unsafe. Staff do not compress bags or reach into containers.
  4. Move closed waste by the approved internal route to the secure storage area, keeping incompatible streams separate and protecting patient-identifiable material.
  5. Record the stream, source, date, quantity or container reference and any required transfer or consignment details.
  6. Release waste only to the approved registered carrier or contractor after the collection and documentation checks are complete.
  7. Reconcile collection notes, consignment notes, missed collections and contractor exceptions against the waste log.
  8. Isolate and report a leaking, damaged, mis-segregated, unlabelled, rejected or uncollected container. The manager records the immediate control, investigation, disposal outcome and any improvement action.

9. Sharps safety

The service must reduce sharps risk by:

Staff must not use sharps unless trained and authorised.

10. Sharps containers

Sharps containers must be:

A sharps container must not be used if it is damaged, incorrectly assembled, overfilled or contaminated externally.

11. Medicines and pharmaceutical waste

Medicines waste must be managed in line with the Medicines Policy and waste contractor arrangements.

The service must have clear arrangements for:

Medicines must not be placed into ordinary waste unless the service's approved procedure allows this for that specific waste type.

12. Waste storage

Waste must be stored safely before collection.

Storage arrangements must ensure:

Clinical waste must not be stored in a way that compromises dignity, cleanliness, infection control or public safety.

13. Waste collection and contractor assurance

The service must use authorised waste contractors appropriate to the waste stream.

The service must retain evidence of:

Where a contractor fails to collect waste or waste accumulates, the Registered Manager must assess risk and take action.

14. Waste generated off site

Where staff generate waste in a person's home, vehicle, community setting or temporary location, the service must have a safe procedure for:

Staff must not leave clinical waste or sharps in a person's home unless this is part of an agreed, lawful and safe arrangement.

15. Sharps injury and exposure response

If a sharps injury, bite, splash, blood exposure or body-fluid exposure occurs, staff must:

The service must not delay urgent advice after a sharps injury.

16. Spills and contamination

The service must have arrangements for blood, body-fluid and chemical spills.

This must include:

Staff must not clean spills unless trained and equipped to do so.

17. Staff training

Staff must receive training appropriate to their role on:

Training must be recorded.

18. Incidents and concerns

The following must be reported as incidents:

The Registered Manager must review incidents for learning and action.

19. Audit

The Registered Manager must audit clinical waste and sharps arrangements at least quarterly, or more often where risk is high.

The audit must check:

Findings must be added to the action plan or risk register where required.

20. Related records

The service must keep:

21. Related policies

This policy should be read with:

22. Review

This policy will be reviewed annually, or sooner following a sharps injury, clinical waste incident, CQC finding, infection-control concern, contractor change, waste audit failure, service change or change in national guidance.

23. Sources and further reading

This template is based on CQC's guidance for providers and managers, the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, and other topic-specific legislation and guidance listed below. It is a starting point for adaptation, not a substitute for legal, clinical, HR, safeguarding or specialist professional advice.

24. When to seek further advice

Seek specialist advice where the issue involves serious harm, safeguarding, deprivation of liberty, restraint, children, professional misconduct, controlled drugs, radiation, termination of pregnancy, infection outbreak, water safety, employment dismissal, DBS barring referral, or regulatory enforcement.

25. Document control

Version Date Author Changes
v1.1 2026-07-21 Verivius (sample) Added an end-to-end waste workflow, the 2013 sharps duties and current HSE and Environment Agency source links.
v1 2026-06-10 Verivius (sample) Initial sample template, conformed to the Verivius policy standard.

This sample policy template was issued by Verivius. It is a template, not a substitute for legal advice or the provider's own policy-development process. Where this template and live law or regulator guidance diverge, the live source wins.

What good looks like here

Written from an ex-CQC inspector's chair, but the point is safe, well-led care your team can stand behind. Each row shows what strong evidence looks like, what thin evidence looks like, and where the expectation comes from.

The people this policy protects are mostly the ones who never chose to be near the hazard: the healthcare assistant who takes a needlestick while clearing up after a procedure, the cleaner or waste handler who lifts a bag that was mis-segregated three steps upstream, and the passer-by or child who reaches into an unsecured bin. A sharps injury cannot be undone once it has happened. What changes the outcome is how fast the injured person reaches urgent advice and how honestly the source risk is worked through, which is why the exposure record and the distinct reporting duties carry more weight here than almost anywhere in the library. Clinical waste is also one of the few risks a service can export beyond its own walls. Once a bag leaves the building, the transfer and consignment trail is the only thing that proves it reached a place licensed to destroy it, rather than a fly-tip or a mixed skip where it can harm someone the provider will never meet. That trail is not paperwork for its own sake: it is the chain of custody for material that can pass a blood-borne virus to a stranger.

  1. A sharp goes straight into the correct sharps container at the point of use, and safer-sharps devices are in use wherever it is reasonably practicable to have them, so a needlestick is designed out before it can happen rather than left to a careful hand. Needles are not re-sheathed, left on a tray or carried loose to a bin down the corridor.

    Strong evidence: The sharps risk assessment showing, for each procedure that uses a sharp, whether a safer-sharps device was adopted or why it was not reasonably practicable, held with the point-of-use walk-round confirming an assembled container is within reach wherever sharps are used.

    Weak evidence: A generic safer-sharps statement that names no device and no procedure, or a walk-round that finds sharps bins on the floor, out of arm's reach, or shared between two rooms so a used needle travels before it is discarded. Re-sheathing still happening in practice with no risk assessment that permits it.

    A legal duty. This comes from legislation that applies to your service, so meeting it is not optional. The exact provision is cited beneath the badge.

    Health and Safety (Sharp Instruments in Healthcare) Regulations 2013, reg 5 (use and disposal of medical sharps)

  2. Waste is separated into the right stream at the moment and place it is produced, so infectious, offensive, medicinal and sharps waste each reach the treatment the law sets for them, not whichever bag is nearest. Staff who are unsure ask a senior person before they dispose, rather than guess.

    Strong evidence: The service's own waste-segregation guide, built from the streams this service actually generates and its contractor's requirements, displayed where waste is produced, with the waste-segregation audit sampling bags and containers against it. HTM 07-01 is the technical standard the guide follows; it is guidance, not law.

    Weak evidence: A generic colour-coding poster that lists streams the service never produces and misses the ones it does, or an audit that finds medicinal or clinical waste in the domestic stream, offensive waste bagged as infectious, or a segregation guide nobody can locate at the point of disposal.

    What the regulator expects to see. Not a law in itself, but CQC judges you against it, so an inspector will look for it and expect a reason where you depart from it.

  3. Every load of clinical or hazardous waste can be traced from the treatment room to a permitted destination, because it left only with a registered carrier and the transfer or consignment note was completed and kept. The provider can show where a given collection went, not just that a bin was emptied.

    Strong evidence: The waste transfer notes and, for hazardous waste, the consignment notes retained for the period the law requires, each matched to a carrier whose registration the service has confirmed, reconciled against the collection log so a missed or rejected collection is visible and acted on.

    Weak evidence: Consignment notes that stop halfway, a carrier taken on trust with no registration ever checked, or a store of waste with no paperwork tying it to a collection. Missed collections recorded nowhere, so waste accumulating past safe capacity leaves no trail until someone notices the smell.

    A legal duty. This comes from legislation that applies to your service, so meeting it is not optional. The exact provision is cited beneath the badge.

    Environmental Protection Act 1990, section 34 (duty of care as respects waste)

  4. When a sharps injury or a blood or body-fluid exposure happens, the injured person gets urgent occupational-health or emergency advice without delay, and each separate duty the event may trigger is weighed in its own right. A local incident record does not stand in for a RIDDOR assessment, and neither discharges a CQC statutory notification where one is due.

    Strong evidence: A completed exposure record showing immediate first aid, the time urgent advice was sought and from whom, the source-risk consideration where lawful, and separate lines for the RIDDOR assessment, the incident investigation and any CQC notification, so the reader can see each duty was considered on its own.

    Weak evidence: An injury logged days later, an exposure form that records the wound but not whether urgent advice was ever sought, or a single tick that treats the incident report as having covered RIDDOR and everything else at once. A run of minor sharps injuries with no theme ever reviewed for learning.

    A legal duty. This comes from legislation that applies to your service, so meeting it is not optional. The exact provision is cited beneath the badge.

    Health and Safety (Sharp Instruments in Healthcare) Regulations 2013, reg 7 (arrangements in the event of injury)

  5. Sharps containers are assembled, closed at the manufacturer's marked line and locked shut exactly as the manufacturer's instructions set out, and full or awaiting-collection waste is held in a secure store that unauthorised people, including anyone using the service, cannot reach. A container is taken out of use the moment it is damaged, wrongly assembled or over the fill line.

    Strong evidence: The point-of-use and storage audit checking containers against the manufacturer's assembly and fill-line instructions, temporary closures used between uses, full containers locked, and the waste store kept secure, clean and separated from clean areas.

    Weak evidence: Containers filled past the manufacturer's line, assembled with the lid not engaged so it lifts off, or left open on a worktop. A waste store left unlocked, shared with clean supplies, or reachable by people using the service or the public, so a passer-by could lift a bag of infectious waste.

    The instructions from the maker of a product, device, or medicine. Following them is how the item is used safely, and for medical devices it is effectively expected.

  6. No one handles sharps or waste until they have been trained for the streams and devices they will actually meet, and the whole arrangement is audited on a set cadence so findings turn into completed actions rather than a filed checklist. A repeated segregation or container error becomes a fixed cause, not a recurring line in the audit.

    Strong evidence: The training record tied to each role's real exposure (segregation, sharps use, container handling, spill and exposure response), and the completed waste-and-sharps audit whose findings carry owners, due dates and completion evidence, with recurring errors escalated to the risk register. The at-least-quarterly audit cadence is a Verivius default, not a statutory interval.

    Weak evidence: A single all-green tick-sheet with no sample size or named findings, an audit many months old, or the same overfilled-container or wrong-stream finding reappearing each cycle with nothing done between. Training logged as attendance with nothing showing the person can safely handle the waste they produce.

    Our recommended baseline. Not a legal or regulatory requirement, but a sensible standard we suggest where the rules leave the detail to you. Adapt it to your service.

Related

Last verified 20 July 2026

Spotted something to improve?

These are sample templates, not the last word. If you would change a wording, or want to help us confirm a detail, tell us and we will look at it.

Related Verivius content

Want help adapting this to your service?

A Verivius consultant can read your adapted policy against the live regulation and your service shape. The work fits inside a Mock Inspection engagement or a shorter consulting brief. A 20-minute conversation is the fastest way to find out whether the fit is right.

Get started free

Free to start, no card. A 14-day trial when you subscribe.

Last reviewed 21 July 2026